File util.js
has 551 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Copyright Joyent, Inc. and other Node contributors.
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
// copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
// "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
Function formatValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatValue(ctx, value, recurseTimes) {
// Provide a hook for user-specified inspect functions.
// Check that value is an object with an inspect function on it
if (ctx.customInspect &&
value &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatProperty
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatProperty(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, key, array) {
var name, str, desc;
desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(value, key) || { value: value[key] };
if (desc.get) {
if (desc.set) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatValue
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatValue(ctx, value, recurseTimes) {
// Provide a hook for user-specified inspect functions.
// Check that value is an object with an inspect function on it
if (ctx.customInspect &&
value &&
Function format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.format = function(f) {
if (!isString(f)) {
var objects = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
objects.push(inspect(arguments[i]));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatProperty
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatProperty(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, key, array) {
var name, str, desc;
desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(value, key) || { value: value[key] };
if (desc.get) {
if (desc.set) {
Function format
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.format = function(f) {
if (!isString(f)) {
var objects = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
objects.push(inspect(arguments[i]));
Function pump
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.pump = exports.deprecate(function(readStream, writeStream, callback) {
var callbackCalled = false;
function call(a, b, c) {
if (callback && !callbackCalled) {
Function inspect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function inspect(obj, opts) {
// default options
var ctx = {
seen: [],
stylize: stylizeNoColor
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function deprecate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.deprecate = function(fn, msg) {
// Allow for deprecating things in the process of starting up.
if (isUndefined(global.process)) {
return function() {
return exports.deprecate(fn, msg).apply(this, arguments);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatPrimitive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatPrimitive(ctx, value) {
if (isUndefined(value))
return ctx.stylize('undefined', 'undefined');
if (isString(value)) {
var simple = '\'' + JSON.stringify(value).replace(/^"|"$/g, '')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatProperty
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatProperty(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, key, array) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (ctx.customInspect &&
value &&
isFunction(value.inspect) &&
// Filter out the util module, it's inspect function is special
value.inspect !== exports.inspect &&
Function formatArray
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatArray(ctx, value, recurseTimes, visibleKeys, keys) {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize(Date.prototype.toString.call(value), 'date');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize('[String: ' + formatted + ']', 'string');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize('[Boolean: ' + formatted + ']', 'boolean');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return braces[0] + base + braces[1];
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return formatError(value);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize('null', 'null');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize('[Number: ' + formatted + ']', 'number');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return reduceToSingleString(output, base, braces);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize('' + value, 'boolean');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize('[Object]', 'special');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize(RegExp.prototype.toString.call(value), 'regexp');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ctx.stylize(value.toString(), 'symbol');
Function debuglog
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.debuglog = function(set) {
if (isUndefined(debugEnviron))
debugEnviron = process.env.NODE_DEBUG || '';
set = set.toUpperCase();
if (!debugs[set]) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
exports.error = exports.deprecate(function(x) {
for (var i = 0, len = arguments.length; i < len; ++i) {
process.stderr.write(arguments[i] + '\n');
}
}, 'util.error: Use console.error instead');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
exports.puts = exports.deprecate(function() {
for (var i = 0, len = arguments.length; i < len; ++i) {
process.stdout.write(arguments[i] + '\n');
}
}, 'util.puts: Use console.log instead');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isNumber(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
base = ' ' + '[Number: ' + formatted + ']';
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isString(raw)) {
formatted = formatPrimitiveNoColor(ctx, raw);
base = ' ' + '[String: ' + formatted + ']';
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76