Function CheckToken
has a Cognitive Complexity of 291 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def CheckToken(self, token, state):
"""Checks a token, given the current parser_state, for warnings and errors.
Args:
token: The current token under consideration
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File ecmalintrules.py
has 518 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# Copyright 2008 The Closure Linter Authors. All Rights Reserved.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
Function _CheckLineLength
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _CheckLineLength(self, last_token, state):
"""Checks whether the line is too long.
Args:
last_token: The last token in the line.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _CheckJsDocType
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _CheckJsDocType(self, token):
"""Checks the given type for style errors.
Args:
token: The DOC_FLAG token for the flag whose type to check.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if not is_immediately_called and (last_in_line or
not token.next.type == Type.SEMICOLON):
self._HandleError(errors.MISSING_SEMICOLON_AFTER_FUNCTION,
'Missing semicolon after function assigned to a variable',
token, Position.AtEnd(token.string))
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if not last_in_line and token.next.type == Type.SEMICOLON:
self._HandleError(errors.ILLEGAL_SEMICOLON_AFTER_FUNCTION,
'Illegal semicolon after function declaration',
token.next, Position.All(token.next.string))
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if end_token.type in Type.FLAG_DESCRIPTION_TYPES:
end_string = htmlutil.StripTags(end_token.string).rstrip()
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if jsdoc.HasFlag('override'):
self._HandleError(errors.INVALID_OVERRIDE_PRIVATE,
'%s should not override a private member.' % identifier,
jsdoc.GetFlag('override').flag_token)
# Can have a private class which inherits documentation from a
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if jsdoc.HasFlag('private') and 'underscore' in jsdoc.suppressions:
self._HandleError(errors.UNNECESSARY_SUPPRESS,
'@suppress {underscore} is not necessary with @private',
jsdoc.suppressions['underscore'])
elif jsdoc.HasFlag('private'):
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if op == 'I':
# Insertion.
# Parsing doc comments is the same for all languages
# but some languages care about parameters that don't have
# doc comments and some languages don't care.
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if jsdoc.HasFlag('inheritDoc') and not jsdoc.HasFlag('constructor'):
self._HandleError(errors.INVALID_INHERIT_DOC_PRIVATE,
'%s should not inherit from a private member.' % identifier,
jsdoc.GetFlag('inheritDoc').flag_token)
if (not jsdoc.HasFlag('private') and
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if not (comment and comment.lower().count('jsdoc inherited')):
self._HandleError(errors.MISSING_MEMBER_DOCUMENTATION,
"No docs found for member '%s'" % identifier,
token);
elif jsdoc and (not state.InConstructor() or
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while desc_str.endswith('>'):
start_tag_index = desc_str.rfind('<')
if start_tag_index < 0:
break
desc_str = desc_str[:start_tag_index].rstrip()
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (not jsdoc.HasFlag('private') and
not ('underscore' in jsdoc.suppressions)):
self._HandleError(errors.MISSING_PRIVATE,
'Member "%s" must have @private JsDoc.' %
identifier, token)
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if state.GetFunction().is_interface:
if token.previous and token.previous.type == Type.PARAMETERS:
self._HandleError(errors.INTERFACE_CONSTRUCTOR_CANNOT_HAVE_PARAMS,
'Interface constructor cannot have parameters',
token.previous)
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (not first_in_line and token.previous.type == Type.WHITESPACE and
last_non_space_token and
last_non_space_token.type in Type.EXPRESSION_ENDER_TYPES):
self._HandleError(errors.EXTRA_SPACE, 'Extra space before "["',
token.previous, Position.All(token.previous.string))
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (token.previous and token.previous.type == Type.WHITESPACE and
not token.previous.IsFirstInLine() and
not (last_non_space_token and last_non_space_token.line_number ==
token.line_number and
last_non_space_token.type == Type.SEMICOLON)):
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (token.previous and token.previous.type == Type.WHITESPACE and
not token.previous.IsFirstInLine() and
not (last_non_space_token and last_non_space_token.line_number ==
token.line_number and
last_non_space_token.type == Type.SEMICOLON)):
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (token.previous and token.previous.type == Type.WHITESPACE and
last_code and last_code.type in (Type.NORMAL, Type.IDENTIFIER)):
self._HandleError(errors.EXTRA_SPACE,
'Extra space before "%s"' % token.string, token.previous,
Position.All(token.previous.string))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if last_code.IsOperator(','):
self._HandleError(errors.COMMA_AT_END_OF_LITERAL,
'Illegal comma at end of object literal', last_code,
Position.All(last_code.string))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if last_code.IsOperator(','):
self._HandleError(errors.COMMA_AT_END_OF_LITERAL,
'Illegal comma at end of array literal', last_code,
Position.All(last_code.string))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if token.IsFirstInLine():
self._HandleError(errors.ILLEGAL_TAB,
'Illegal tab in whitespace before "%s"' % token.next.string,
token, Position.All(token.string))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76