Sign upLogin

kputnam/stupidedi

View on GitHub
Star
lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method mksegment_tok has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def mksegment_tok(segment_dict, id, elements, position)
        id = id.to_sym
        element_toks = []

        unless segment_dict.defined_at?(id)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mksegment_tok has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def mksegment_tok(segment_dict, id, elements, position)
        id = id.to_sym
        element_toks = []

        unless segment_dict.defined_at?(id)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method mkrepeated_tok has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def mkrepeated_tok(elements, element_use, designator, position)
        element_toks = []

        if element_use.composite?
          elements.each do |e_tag, e_val, e_position|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                unless [:composite, :not_used, :blank, nil].include?(e_tag)
              raise ArgumentError,
                "#{designator} is a composite element"
            end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb on lines 102..107

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 26.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                  unless [:repeated, :blank, :not_used, nil].include?(e_tag)
                raise ArgumentError,
                  "#{designator} is a repeatable element"
              end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/stupidedi/parser/tokenization.rb on lines 136..141

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 26.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status