Showing 384 of 384 total issues
Function 15
has 6373 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],15:[function(require,module,exports){
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v2.2.4
* http://jquery.com/
*
File site-70bd78197e.js
has 8731 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function e(t,n,r){function s(o,u){if(!n[o]){if(!t[o]){var a=typeof require=="function"&&require;if(!u&&a)return a(o,!0);if(i)return i(o,!0);var f=new Error("Cannot find module '"+o+"'");throw f.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",f}var l=n[o]={exports:{}};t[o][0].call(l.exports,function(e){var n=t[o][1][e];return s(n?n:e)},l,l.exports,e,t,n,r)}return n[o].exports}var i=typeof require=="function"&&require;for(var o=0;o<r.length;o++)s(r[o]);return s})({1:[function(require,module,exports){
/**
* bootstrap-switch - Turn checkboxes and radio buttons into toggle switches.
*
* @version v3.3.4
Function Sizzle
has 1387 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function( window ) {
var i,
support,
Expr,
Function 13
has a Cognitive Complexity of 277 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],13:[function(require,module,exports){
/* ========================================================================
* Bootstrap: tooltip.js v3.3.7
* http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#tooltip
* Inspired by the original jQuery.tipsy by Jason Frame
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 1
has 735 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function e(t,n,r){function s(o,u){if(!n[o]){if(!t[o]){var a=typeof require=="function"&&require;if(!u&&a)return a(o,!0);if(i)return i(o,!0);var f=new Error("Cannot find module '"+o+"'");throw f.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",f}var l=n[o]={exports:{}};t[o][0].call(l.exports,function(e){var n=t[o][1][e];return s(n?n:e)},l,l.exports,e,t,n,r)}return n[o].exports}var i=typeof require=="function"&&require;for(var o=0;o<r.length;o++)s(r[o]);return s})({1:[function(require,module,exports){
/**
* bootstrap-switch - Turn checkboxes and radio buttons into toggle switches.
*
* @version v3.3.4
Function BootstrapSwitch
has 639 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var BootstrapSwitch = function () {
function BootstrapSwitch(element) {
var _this = this;
var options = arguments.length > 1 && arguments[1] !== undefined ? arguments[1] : {};
File font.js
has 897 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var font = [
[
0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,
Function 13
has 380 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],13:[function(require,module,exports){
/* ========================================================================
* Bootstrap: tooltip.js v3.3.7
* http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#tooltip
* Inspired by the original jQuery.tipsy by Jason Frame
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@pytest.mark.django_db
def test_station_infos_ok_velib(app, requests_mocker, settings):
app.provider = 'velib'
app.save()
with requests_mocker as m:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 198.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@pytest.mark.django_db
def test_station_infos_ok_star(app, requests_mocker, settings):
app.provider = 'star'
app.save()
with requests_mocker as m:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 198.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function 3
has a Cognitive Complexity of 72 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{"../../js/affix.js":3,"../../js/alert.js":4,"../../js/button.js":5,"../../js/carousel.js":6,"../../js/collapse.js":7,"../../js/dropdown.js":8,"../../js/modal.js":9,"../../js/popover.js":10,"../../js/scrollspy.js":11,"../../js/tab.js":12,"../../js/tooltip.js":13,"../../js/transition.js":14}],3:[function(require,module,exports){
/* ========================================================================
* Bootstrap: affix.js v3.3.7
* http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#affix
* ========================================================================
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 6
has a Cognitive Complexity of 70 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],6:[function(require,module,exports){
/* ========================================================================
* Bootstrap: carousel.js v3.3.7
* http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#carousel
* ========================================================================
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 9
has a Cognitive Complexity of 69 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],9:[function(require,module,exports){
/* ========================================================================
* Bootstrap: modal.js v3.3.7
* http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#modals
* ========================================================================
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@classmethod
def get_station_infos(cls, station_id):
req = requests.get(settings.STAR_API_BASE_URL,
params={'apikey': settings.STAR_API_KEY,
'dataset': 'vls-stations-etat-tr',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 156.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@classmethod
def get_station_infos(cls, station_id):
req = requests.get(settings.VELIB_API_BASE_URL,
params={'apikey': settings.VELIB_API_KEY,
'dataset': 'stations-velib-disponibilites-en-temps-reel',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 156.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function ajax
has 249 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
Function 9
has 247 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],9:[function(require,module,exports){
/* ========================================================================
* Bootstrap: modal.js v3.3.7
* http://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#modals
* ========================================================================
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def test_data_ok_one_bus(app, mocker, requests_mocker, settings):
assert app.should_update() is True
now = timezone.now()
now = now.replace(year=2017, month=7, day=22, hour=20, minute=19, second=10)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def test_data_ok(app, mocker, requests_mocker, settings):
assert app.should_update() is True
now = timezone.now()
now = now.replace(year=2017, month=7, day=22, hour=20, minute=19, second=10)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function setDocument
has 218 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setDocument = Sizzle.setDocument = function( node ) {
var hasCompare, parent,
doc = node ? node.ownerDocument || node : preferredDoc;
// Return early if doc is invalid or already selected