Showing 169 of 257 total issues

Function guess_entity_software has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def guess_entity_software(e):
    for elt in chain(
        e.findall(".//{%s}SingleSignOnService" % NS['md']), e.findall(".//{%s}AssertionConsumerService" % NS['md'])
    ):
        location = elt.get('Location')
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/samlmd.py - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function search has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def search(self, query=None, path=None, entity_filter=None, related=None):
        """
        :param query: A string to search for.
        :param path: The repository collection (@Name) to search in - None for search in all collections
        :param entity_filter: An optional lookup expression used to filter the entries before search is done.
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/store.py - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function guess_entity_software has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def guess_entity_software(e):
    for elt in chain(
        e.findall(".//{%s}SingleSignOnService" % NS['md']), e.findall(".//{%s}AssertionConsumerService" % NS['md'])
    ):
        location = elt.get('Location')
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/utils.py - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function select has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def select(req: Plumbing.Request, *opts):
    """
    Select a set of EntityDescriptor elements as the working document.

    :param req: The request
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/builtins.py - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function guess_entity_software. (35)
Open

def guess_entity_software(e):
    for elt in chain(
        e.findall(".//{%s}SingleSignOnService" % NS['md']), e.findall(".//{%s}AssertionConsumerService" % NS['md'])
    ):
        location = elt.get('Location')
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/samlmd.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function guess_entity_software. (35)
Open

def guess_entity_software(e):
    for elt in chain(
        e.findall(".//{%s}SingleSignOnService" % NS['md']), e.findall(".//{%s}AssertionConsumerService" % NS['md'])
    ):
        location = elt.get('Location')
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/utils.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function process_handler has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def process_handler(request: Request) -> Response:
    """
    The main request handler for pyFF. Implements API call hooks and content negotiation.

    :param request: the HTTP request object
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/api.py - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File constants.py has 432 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""
Useful constants for pyFF. Mostly XML namespace declarations.
"""

import getopt
Severity: Minor
Found in src/pyff/constants.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    File api.py has 431 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    import importlib
    import threading
    from datetime import datetime, timedelta
    from json import dumps
    from typing import Any, Dict, Generator, Iterable, List, Mapping, Optional, Tuple
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/pyff/api.py - About 6 hrs to fix

      Function parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def parse(self, resource: Resource, content: str) -> EidasMDParserInfo:
              info = EidasMDParserInfo(description='eIDAS MetadataServiceList', expiration_time='None')
              t = parse_xml(unicode_stream(content))
              if config.xinclude:
                  t.xinclude()
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/pyff/samlmd.py - About 6 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      File resource.py has 403 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      """
      
      An abstraction layer for metadata fetchers. Supports both synchronous and asynchronous fetchers with cache.
      
      """
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/pyff/resource.py - About 5 hrs to fix

        Function finalize has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def finalize(req: Plumbing.Request, *opts):
            """
            Prepares the working document for publication/rendering.
        
            :param req: The request
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/builtins.py - About 5 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function process_handler. (27)
        Open

        def process_handler(request: Request) -> Response:
            """
            The main request handler for pyFF. Implements API call hooks and content negotiation.
        
            :param request: the HTTP request object
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/api.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function finalize. (25)
        Open

        @pipe
        def finalize(req: Plumbing.Request, *opts):
            """
            Prepares the working document for publication/rendering.
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/builtins.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function certreport has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def certreport(req: Plumbing.Request, *opts):
            """
            Generate a report of the certificates (optionally limited by expiration time or key size) found in the selection.
        
            :param req: The request
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/builtins.py - About 4 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function discojson_sp has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def discojson_sp(e, global_trust_info=None, global_md_sources=None):
            sp = {}
        
            tinfo_el = e.find('.//{%s}TrustInfo' % NS['ti'])
            if tinfo_el is None:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/samlmd.py - About 4 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function discojson. (22)
        Open

        def discojson(e, sources=None, langs=None, fallback_to_favicon=False, icon_store=None):
            if e is None:
                return dict()
        
            title, descr = entity_extended_display(e)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/samlmd.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function acquireWrite has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def acquireWrite(self, timeout=None):
                """Acquire a write lock for the current thread, waiting at most timeout seconds or doing a non-blocking
                    check in case timeout is <= 0.
        
                * In case the write lock cannot be serviced due to the deadlock condition mentioned above, a ValueError is raised.
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/locks.py - About 4 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function publish has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def publish(req: Plumbing.Request, *opts):
            """
            Publish the working document in XML form.
        
            :param req: The request
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/builtins.py - About 4 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function parse_options. (19)
        Open

        def parse_options(program, docs):
            (short_args, long_args) = config.args(program)
            docs += config.help(program)
            try:
                opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], short_args, long_args)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/pyff/constants.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language