Showing 326 of 326 total issues
Method __construct
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function __construct() {
add_action(
'rest_api_init', function() {
register_rest_route(
$this->namespace, 'count/(?P<name>\w+)', array(
Avoid excessively long variable names like $orphan_term_relationships_sql. Keep variable name length under 20. Open
$orphan_term_relationships_sql = implode( "','", array_map( 'esc_sql', $this->get_excluded_taxonomies() ) );
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
LongVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, formal or local variable is declared with a long name.
Example
class Something {
protected $reallyLongIntName = -3; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $interestingArgumentsList[] ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$otherReallyLongName = -5; // VIOLATION - Local
for ($interestingIntIndex = 0; // VIOLATION - For
$interestingIntIndex < 10;
$interestingIntIndex++ ) {
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#longvariable
Avoid excessively long variable names like $wp_remove_object_terms. Keep variable name length under 20. Open
$wp_remove_object_terms = wp_remove_object_terms( (int) $tax->object_id, (int) $tax->term_id, $tax->taxonomy );
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
LongVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, formal or local variable is declared with a long name.
Example
class Something {
protected $reallyLongIntName = -3; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $interestingArgumentsList[] ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$otherReallyLongName = -5; // VIOLATION - Local
for ($interestingIntIndex = 0; // VIOLATION - For
$interestingIntIndex < 10;
$interestingIntIndex++ ) {
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#longvariable
Avoid excessively long variable names like $orphan_term_relationships_sql. Keep variable name length under 20. Open
$orphan_term_relationships_sql = implode( "','", array_map( 'esc_sql', $this->get_excluded_taxonomies() ) );
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
LongVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, formal or local variable is declared with a long name.
Example
class Something {
protected $reallyLongIntName = -3; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $interestingArgumentsList[] ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$otherReallyLongName = -5; // VIOLATION - Local
for ($interestingIntIndex = 0; // VIOLATION - For
$interestingIntIndex < 10;
$interestingIntIndex++ ) {
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#longvariable
Method total_count
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function total_count( $name ) {
global $wpdb;
$count = 0;
Function total_count
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function total_count( $name ) {
global $wpdb;
$count = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method __invoke
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function __invoke( $args, $assoc_args ) {
$items = array();
$default_items = array(
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 'auto_drafts':
$query = $wpdb->get_col( $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT ID FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE post_status = %s", 'auto-draft' ) );
if ( $query ) {
foreach ( $query as $id ) {
wp_delete_post( (int) $id, true );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 'unapproved_comments':
$query = $wpdb->get_col( $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT comment_ID FROM $wpdb->comments WHERE comment_approved = %s", '0' ) );
if ( $query ) {
foreach ( $query as $id ) {
wp_delete_comment( (int) $id, true );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 'spam_comments':
$query = $wpdb->get_col( $wpdb->prepare( "SELECT comment_ID FROM $wpdb->comments WHERE comment_approved = %s", 'spam' ) );
if ( $query ) {
foreach ( $query as $id ) {
wp_delete_comment( (int) $id, true );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function get_default_taxonomy_termids
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function get_default_taxonomy_termids() {
$taxonomies = get_taxonomies();
$default_term_ids = array();
if ( $taxonomies ) {
$tax = array_keys( $taxonomies );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$.get(ajaxurl, { action: $node.data( 'action' ), sweep_name: $node.data( 'sweep_name' ), sweep_type: $node.data( 'sweep_type' ), '_wpnonce': $node.data( 'nonce' ) }, function(data) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return $.get(ajaxurl, { action: $node.data( 'action' ), sweep_name: $node.data( 'sweep_name' ), sweep_type: $node.data( 'sweep_type' ), '_wpnonce': $node.data( 'nonce' ) }, function(data) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function ajax_sweep
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function ajax_sweep() {
// Verify referer and check permissions.
if (
empty( $_GET['sweep_name'] )
|| empty( $_GET['sweep_type'] )
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
The class WPSweep_Api is not named in CamelCase. Open
class WPSweep_Api {
/**
* WP-Sweep WP Rest API namespace
*
* @var string
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseClassName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the CamelCase notation to name classes.
Example
class class_name {
}
Source
The parameter $assoc_args is not named in camelCase. Open
public function __invoke( $args, $assoc_args ) {
$items = array();
$default_items = array(
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}
Source
The property $limit_details is not named in camelCase. Open
class WPSweep {
/**
* Limit the number of items to show for sweep details
*
* @since 1.0.3
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCasePropertyName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name attributes.
Example
class ClassName {
protected $property_name;
}
Source
The class WPSweep_Command is not named in CamelCase. Open
class WPSweep_Command extends WP_CLI_Command {
/**
* Clean up unused, orphaned and duplicated data in your WordPress
*
* ## OPTIONS
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseClassName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the CamelCase notation to name classes.
Example
class class_name {
}
Source
The parameter $network_wide is not named in camelCase. Open
public function plugin_activation( $network_wide ) {
if ( is_multisite() && $network_wide ) {
$ms_sites = (array) get_sites();
if ( 0 < count( $ms_sites ) ) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}
Source
The parameter $network_wide is not named in camelCase. Open
public function plugin_deactivation( $network_wide ) {
if ( is_multisite() && $network_wide ) {
$ms_sites = (array) get_sites();
if ( 0 < count( $ms_sites ) ) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}