The class Metagen has 12 public methods. Consider refactoring Metagen to keep number of public methods under 10. Open
class Metagen
{
/**
* @var Helper
*/
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
TooManyPublicMethods
Since: 0.1
A class with too many public methods is probably a good suspect for refactoring, in order to reduce its complexity and find a way to have more fine grained objects.
By default it ignores methods starting with 'get' or 'set'.
Example
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#toomanypublicmethods
File Metagen.php
has 280 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php declare(strict_types=1);
namespace XoopsModules\Publisher;
/*
Method generateSeoTitle
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function generateSeoTitle($title = '', $withExt = true)
{
// Transformation de la chaine en minuscule
// Codage de la chaine afin d'éviter les erreurs 500 en cas de caractères imprévus
$title = \rawurlencode(\mb_strtolower($title));
Method html2text
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function html2text($document)
{
if (empty($document)) {
return '';
}
Function findMetaKeywords
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function findMetaKeywords($text, $minChar)
{
$keywords = [];
$text = $this->purifyText($text);
$text = $this->html2text($text);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setTitle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function setTitle($title): void
{
$this->title = $this->html2text($title);
$this->originalTitle = $this->title;
$titleTag = [];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
The method setTitle() has a Cyclomatic Complexity of 12. The configured cyclomatic complexity threshold is 10. Open
public function setTitle($title): void
{
$this->title = $this->html2text($title);
$this->originalTitle = $this->title;
$titleTag = [];
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CyclomaticComplexity
Since: 0.1
Complexity is determined by the number of decision points in a method plus one for the method entry. The decision points are 'if', 'while', 'for', and 'case labels'. Generally, 1-4 is low complexity, 5-7 indicates moderate complexity, 8-10 is high complexity, and 11+ is very high complexity.
Example
// Cyclomatic Complexity = 11
class Foo {
1 public function example() {
2 if ($a == $b) {
3 if ($a1 == $b1) {
fiddle();
4 } elseif ($a2 == $b2) {
fiddle();
} else {
fiddle();
}
5 } elseif ($c == $d) {
6 while ($c == $d) {
fiddle();
}
7 } elseif ($e == $f) {
8 for ($n = 0; $n < $h; $n++) {
fiddle();
}
} else {
switch ($z) {
9 case 1:
fiddle();
break;
10 case 2:
fiddle();
break;
11 case 3:
fiddle();
break;
default:
fiddle();
break;
}
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#cyclomaticcomplexity
The method generateSeoTitle has a boolean flag argument $withExt, which is a certain sign of a Single Responsibility Principle violation. Open
public static function generateSeoTitle($title = '', $withExt = true)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
BooleanArgumentFlag
Since: 1.4.0
A boolean flag argument is a reliable indicator for a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). You can fix this problem by extracting the logic in the boolean flag into its own class or method.
Example
class Foo {
public function bar($flag = true) {
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#booleanargumentflag
The method purifyText has a boolean flag argument $keyword, which is a certain sign of a Single Responsibility Principle violation. Open
public function purifyText($text, $keyword = false)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
BooleanArgumentFlag
Since: 1.4.0
A boolean flag argument is a reliable indicator for a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). You can fix this problem by extracting the logic in the boolean flag into its own class or method.
Example
class Foo {
public function bar($flag = true) {
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#booleanargumentflag
Avoid using static access to class '\MyTextSanitizer' in method '__construct'. Open
$this->myts = \MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class 'XoopsModules\Publisher\Helper' in method '__construct'. Open
$this->helper = Helper::getInstance();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid unused parameters such as '$maxWords'. Open
public function createMetaDescription($maxWords = 30)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
UnusedFormalParameter
Since: 0.2
Avoid passing parameters to methods or constructors and then not using those parameters.
Example
class Foo
{
private function bar($howdy)
{
// $howdy is not used
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/unusedcode.html#unusedformalparameter
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$pattern = [
'/%09/', // Tab
'/%20/', // Space
'/%21/', // !
'/%22/', // "
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$repPat = ['-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-100', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-at-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-', '-'];
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid variables with short names like $i. Configured minimum length is 3. Open
$i = 1;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ShortVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, local, or parameter has a very short name.
Example
class Something {
private $q = 15; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $as ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$r = 20 + $this->q; // VIOLATION - Local
for (int $i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) { // Not a Violation (inside FOR)
$r += $this->q;
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#shortvariable
A file should declare new symbols (classes, functions, constants, etc.) and cause no other side effects, or it should execute logic with side effects, but should not do both. The first symbol is defined on line 27 and the first side effect is on line 22. Open
<?php declare(strict_types=1);
- Exclude checks
Line indented incorrectly; expected 8 spaces, found 12 Open
},
- Exclude checks
Line indented incorrectly; expected 8 spaces, found 12 Open
static function ($matches) {
- Exclude checks