File builder.js
has 574 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import assert from "assert";
import {WatchSet, readAndWatchFile, sha1} from '../fs/watch';
import files, {
symlinkWithOverwrite, realpath,
} from '../fs/files';
Function _copyDirectory
has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_copyDirectory({
from, to,
ignore,
specificFiles,
symlink,
Function walk
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const walk = (absFrom, relTo) => {
if (symlink && ! (relTo in this.usedAsFile)) {
this._ensureDirectory(files.pathDirname(relTo));
const absTo = files.pathResolve(this.buildPath, relTo);
if (this.previousCreatedSymlinks[absFrom] !== relTo) {
Function reserve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
reserve(relPath, {directory} = {}) {
// Ensure no trailing slash
if (relPath.slice(-1) === files.pathSep) {
relPath = relPath.slice(0, -1);
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _sanitize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_sanitize(relPath, isDirectory) {
const parts = relPath.split(files.pathSep);
const partsOut = [];
for (let i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
let part = parts[i];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
write(relPath, {data, file, hash, sanitize, executable, symlink}) {
relPath = this._normalizeFilePath(relPath, sanitize);
let getData = null;
if (data) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function copyTranspiledModules
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
copyTranspiledModules(relativePaths, {
sourceRootDir,
targetRootDir = this.outputPath,
needToTranspile = files.inCheckout(),
}) {
Function _copyDirectory
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_copyDirectory({
from, to,
ignore,
specificFiles,
symlink,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function enter
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
enter(relPath) {
const subBuilder = {};
const relPathWithSep = relPath + files.pathSep;
const methods = [
"write",
Function write
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
write(relPath, {data, file, hash, sanitize, executable, symlink}) {
relPath = this._normalizeFilePath(relPath, sanitize);
let getData = null;
if (data) {
Function constructor
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor({
outputPath,
previousBuilder,
// Even though in-place builds are disabled by default on some
// platforms (Windows), they can be forcibly re-enabled with this
Function _sanitize
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_sanitize(relPath, isDirectory) {
const parts = relPath.split(files.pathSep);
const partsOut = [];
for (let i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
let part = parts[i];
Function reserve
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
reserve(relPath, {directory} = {}) {
// Ensure no trailing slash
if (relPath.slice(-1) === files.pathSep) {
relPath = relPath.slice(0, -1);
}
Function _ensureDirectory
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_ensureDirectory(relPath) {
const parts = files.pathNormalize(relPath).split(files.pathSep);
if (parts.length > 1 && parts[parts.length - 1] === '') {
// remove trailing slash
parts.pop();
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor({
outputPath,
previousBuilder,
// Even though in-place builds are disabled by default on some
// platforms (Windows), they can be forcibly re-enabled with this
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (this.previousUsedAsFile[soFar]) {
files.unlink(soFar);
} else {
needToMkdir = false;
}
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (relPath.slice(-1) === files.pathSep) {
relPath = relPath.slice(0, -1);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (relPath.slice(-1) === files.pathSep) {
relPath = relPath.slice(0, -1);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76