File authn.ts
has 1031 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* signin.js
*
* Signing in, signing up, profile and preferences reloading
* Type index management
Function selectWorkspace
has 151 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function selectWorkspace (
dom: HTMLDocument,
appDetails: AppDetails,
callbackWS: (workspace: string | null, newBase: string) => void
): HTMLElement {
Function displayOptions
has 120 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function displayOptions (context) {
// const status = ''
const id = context.me
const preferencesFile = context.preferencesFile
let newBase = null
Function selectWorkspace
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function selectWorkspace (
dom: HTMLDocument,
appDetails: AppDetails,
callbackWS: (workspace: string | null, newBase: string) => void
): HTMLElement {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function loginStatusBox
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function loginStatusBox (
dom: HTMLDocument,
listener: ((uri: string | null) => void) | null = null,
options: {
buttonStyle?: string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function loginStatusBox
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function loginStatusBox (
dom: HTMLDocument,
listener: ((uri: string | null) => void) | null = null,
options: {
buttonStyle?: string
Function ensureOneTypeIndex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function ensureOneTypeIndex (context: AuthenticationContext, isPublic: boolean): Promise<AuthenticationContext | void> {
async function makeIndexIfNecessary (context, isPublic) {
const relevant = isPublic ? context.publicProfile : context.preferencesFile
const visibility = isPublic ? 'public' : 'private'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function registrationControl
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function registrationControl (
context: AuthenticationContext,
instance,
klass
): Promise<AuthenticationContext | void> {
Function logInLoadPreferences
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function logInLoadPreferences (context: AuthenticationContext): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
if (context.preferencesFile) return Promise.resolve(context) // already done
const statusArea = context.statusArea || context.div || null
let progressDisplay
Function ensureOneTypeIndex
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function ensureOneTypeIndex (context: AuthenticationContext, isPublic: boolean): Promise<AuthenticationContext | void> {
async function makeIndexIfNecessary (context, isPublic) {
const relevant = isPublic ? context.publicProfile : context.preferencesFile
const visibility = isPublic ? 'public' : 'private'
Function signInOrSignUpBox
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function signInOrSignUpBox (
dom: HTMLDocument,
setUserCallback: (user: string) => void,
options: {
buttonStyle?: string
Function makeIndexIfNecessary
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function makeIndexIfNecessary (context, isPublic) {
const relevant = isPublic ? context.publicProfile : context.preferencesFile
const visibility = isPublic ? 'public' : 'private'
async function putIndex (newIndex) {
Function findAppInstances
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function findAppInstances (
context: AuthenticationContext,
klass: $rdf.NamedNode,
isPublic: boolean
): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
Function registrationList
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function registrationList (context: AuthenticationContext, options: {
private?: boolean
public?: boolean
}): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
const dom = context.dom as HTMLDocument
Function loadIndex
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function loadIndex (
context: AuthenticationContext,
predicate: $rdf.NamedNode,
isPublic: boolean
): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
Function logInLoadProfile
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function logInLoadProfile (context: AuthenticationContext): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
if (context.publicProfile) {
return Promise.resolve(context)
} // already done
const fetcher = kb.fetcher
Function loadIndex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function loadIndex (
context: AuthenticationContext,
predicate: $rdf.NamedNode,
isPublic: boolean
): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setACLUserPublic
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function setACLUserPublic (
docURI: $rdf.NamedNode,
me: $rdf.NamedNode,
options: {
defaultForNew?: boolean,
Function findAppInstances
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function findAppInstances (
context: AuthenticationContext,
klass: $rdf.NamedNode,
isPublic: boolean
): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function offlineTestID
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function offlineTestID (): $rdf.NamedNode | null {
const { $SolidTestEnvironment }: any = window
if (
typeof $SolidTestEnvironment !== 'undefined' &&
$SolidTestEnvironment.username
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return null
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (context.index && context.index.public && context.index.public.length > 0) {
index = context.index.public[0]
statements = registrationStatements(index)
tbody.children[0].appendChild(
widgets.buildCheckboxForm(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (context.index && context.index.private && context.index.private.length > 0) {
index = context.index.private[0]
statements = registrationStatements(index)
tbody.children[1].appendChild(
widgets.buildCheckboxForm(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
await kb.fetcher.load(ixs)
} catch (err) {
widgets.complain(context, `ensureOneTypeIndex: loading indexes ${err}`)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
await kb.fetcher.load(ixs)
} catch (err) {
widgets.complain(context, `loadPubicIndex: loading public type index ${err}`)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (session && session.webId) {
me = $rdf.sym(session.webId)
} else {
me = null
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (session && session.webId) {
me = $rdf.sym(session.webId)
} else {
me = null
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76