Showing 447 of 447 total issues
Method verify_one_responder
has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def verify_one_responder(uri)
original_uri = uri
redirect_count = 0
http_response = nil
loop do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File options_mapper.rb
has 429 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Mongo
class URI
# Performs mapping between URI options and Ruby options.
#
File sdam_flow.rb
has 424 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Mongo::Cluster
# Handles SDAM flow for a server description changed event.
#
# Updates server descriptions, topology descriptions and publishes
# SDAM events.
Class Binding
has 45 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Binding
extend FFI::Library
if ENV['LIBMONGOCRYPT_PATH']
begin
Method add_txn_opts!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_txn_opts!(command, read)
command.tap do |c|
# The read concern should be added to any command that starts a transaction.
if starting_transaction?
# https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SPEC-1161: transaction's
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(seeds, monitoring, options = Options::Redacted.new)
if seeds.nil?
raise ArgumentError, 'Seeds cannot be nil'
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Collection
has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Collection
extend Forwardable
include Retryable
include QueryableEncryption
include Helpers
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update_one(spec, opts = {})
with_session(opts) do |session|
write_concern = if opts[:write_concern]
WriteConcern.get(opts[:write_concern])
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 148.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def replace_one(replacement, opts = {})
with_session(opts) do |session|
write_concern = if opts[:write_concern]
WriteConcern.get(opts[:write_concern])
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 148.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Class Cluster
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Cluster
extend Forwardable
include Monitoring::Publishable
include Event::Subscriber
include Loggable
Class View
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class View
# Defines read related behavior for collection view.
#
# @since 2.0.0
File base.rb
has 342 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Mongo
module ServerSelector
class Base
Method validate_options!
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_options!(addresses = nil, is_srv: nil)
if options[:write] && options[:write_concern] && options[:write] != options[:write_concern]
raise ArgumentError, "If :write and :write_concern are both given, they must be identical: #{options.inspect}"
end
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(addresses_or_uri, options = nil)
options = options ? options.dup : {}
srv_uri = nil
if addresses_or_uri.is_a?(::String)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method server_description_changed
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def server_description_changed
@previous_server_descriptions = servers_list.map do |server|
[server.address.to_s, server.description]
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Server
has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Server
extend Forwardable
include Monitoring::Publishable
include Event::Publisher
Method select_server_impl
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def select_server_impl(cluster, ping, session, write_aggregation, deprioritized)
if cluster.topology.is_a?(Cluster::Topology::LoadBalanced)
return cluster.servers.first
end
Method initialize
has 91 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(addresses_or_uri, options = nil)
options = options ? options.dup : {}
srv_uri = nil
if addresses_or_uri.is_a?(::String)
File server.rb
has 316 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Mongo
# Represents a single server on the server side that can be standalone, part of
# a replica set, or a mongos.
#
Method verify_one_responder
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def verify_one_responder(uri)
original_uri = uri
redirect_count = 0
http_response = nil
loop do