Showing 5 of 9 total issues
Method flatten_with_monad has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def flatten_with_monad(depth=nil)
if depth.is_a? Integer
depth.times.inject(self) { |e, _| e.shallow_flatten }
else
bind do |x|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method + has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def +(other, opts = {})
opts = { :concat_left => DEFAULT_CONCAT, :concat_right => DEFAULT_CONCAT }.merge(opts)
result =
case self
when Left- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_or_else has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_or_else(val_or_lam = nil, &blk)
v_or_f = val_or_lam || blk
if !empty? then value else (v_or_f.respond_to?(:call) ? v_or_f.call : v_or_f) end
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_or_else has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_or_else(val_or_lam = nil, &blk)
v_or_f = val_or_lam || blk
if either_value.left? then either_value.left_value else (v_or_f.respond_to?(:call) ? v_or_f.call : v_or_f) end
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_or_else has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_or_else(val_or_lam = nil, &blk)
v_or_f = val_or_lam || blk
if either_value.right? then either_value.right_value else (v_or_f.respond_to?(:call) ? v_or_f.call : v_or_f) end
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"