Showing 39 of 1,335 total issues
Method to_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_html options = {}
options = {style_with_inline_css: false}.merge(options)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new { |doc|
doc.table do
doc.thead do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method string_optimistic_date_converter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def string_optimistic_date_converter
proc do |v|
if v
rv = v
starts_with_nr = v[0].to_i.to_s == v[0] # it should at least start with a number...
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Row
has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Row
include Workbook::Modules::Cache
include Enumerable
extend Forwardable
Class Table
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Table
include Enumerable
extend Forwardable
include Workbook::Modules::TableDiffSort
Method format_to_xls_format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format_to_xls_format f
unless f.is_a? Workbook::Format
f = Workbook::Format.new f
end
xlsfmt = f.return_raw_for Spreadsheet::Format
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_xlsx_cell
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_xlsx_cell cell
type = cell.attr("t")
format_index = cell.attr("s").to_i
position = cell.attr("r")
formula = cell.css("f").text
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_xlsx
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xlsx options = {}
formats_to_xlsx_format
book = init_xlsx_spreadsheet_template.workbook
book.worksheets.pop(book.worksheets.count - count) if book.worksheets && (book.worksheets.count > count)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_xls
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xls options = {}
book = init_spreadsheet_template
each_with_index do |s, si|
xls_sheet = xls_sheet(si)
xls_sheet.name = s.name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_xlsx
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_xlsx file_obj, options = {}
file_obj = file_obj.path if file_obj.is_a? File
sheets = {}
shared_string_file = ""
styles = ""
Method parse_xls_cell
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_xls_cell xls_cell, xls_row, ci
rv = Workbook::Cell.new nil
begin
rv = Workbook::Cell.new xls_cell
rv.parse!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_html
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_html options = {}
options = {style_with_inline_css: false}.merge(options)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new { |doc|
doc.table do
doc.thead do
Method to_xls
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xls options = {}
book = init_spreadsheet_template
each_with_index do |s, si|
xls_sheet = xls_sheet(si)
xls_sheet.name = s.name
Method create_diff_cell
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_diff_cell(scell, ocell)
dcell = scell.nil? ? Workbook::Cell.new(nil) : scell
if scell == ocell
dcell.format = scell.format if scell
elsif scell.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method column_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_type
return @column_type if defined?(@column_type)
ind = index
table[1..500].each do |row|
if row[ind]&.cell_type
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_xlsx_cell
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_xlsx_cell cell
type = cell.attr("t")
format_index = cell.attr("s").to_i
position = cell.attr("r")
formula = cell.css("f").text
Method string_american_date_converter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def string_american_date_converter
proc do |v|
if v
rv = v
# try strptime with format 'mm/dd/yyyy'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_xlsx
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_xlsx file_obj, options = {}
file_obj = file_obj.path if file_obj.is_a? File
sheets = {}
shared_string_file = ""
styles = ""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method value_to_sym
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def value_to_sym value
v = nil
cell_type ||= ::Workbook::Modules::Cell::CLASS_CELLTYPE_MAPPING[value.class.to_s]
value_to_s = value.to_s.strip.downcase
unless value.nil? || value_to_s == ""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_xlsx
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xlsx options = {}
formats_to_xlsx_format
book = init_xlsx_spreadsheet_template.workbook
book.worksheets.pop(book.worksheets.count - count) if book.worksheets && (book.worksheets.count > count)
Method diff
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diff other, options = {}
options = {sort: true, ignore_headers: false}.merge(options)
aligned = align(other, options)
aself = aligned[:self]