Showing 420 of 433 total issues
Method initialize
has 147 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(user, project: nil, public_token: false)
# Define abilities for the passed in user here. For example:
#
# user ||= User.new # guest user (not logged in)
# if user.is_admin?
File request_mailer.rb
has 411 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class RequestMailer < ApplicationMailer
include AlaveteliFeatures::Helpers
before_action :set_footer_template,
only: [
Method alert_tracks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.alert_tracks
done_something = false
now = Time.zone.now
one_week_ago = now - 7.days
User.where(["last_daily_track_email < ?", now - 1.day ]).find_each do |user|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new
# All new requests are of normal_sort
unless params[:outgoing_message].nil?
params[:outgoing_message][:what_doing] = 'normal_sort'
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import_csv_from_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.import_csv_from_file(csv_filename, tag, tag_behaviour, dry_run, editor, available_locales = [])
errors = []
notes = []
begin
ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
BatchAuthoritySearch.bindXHR = function bindXHR() {
BatchAuthoritySearch.currentXHR.done(function(data) {
$el.trigger(Events.loadingSuccess, {html: data});
});
BatchAuthoritySearch.currentXHR.fail(function(xhr, textStatus) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 143.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
DraftBatchSummary.bindXHR = function bindXHR() {
DraftBatchSummary.currentXHR.done(function(data) {
$el.trigger(Events.loadingSuccess, {html: data});
});
DraftBatchSummary.currentXHR.fail(function(xhr, textStatus) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 143.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method initialize_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_query(options)
#raise options.to_yaml
self.runtime += Benchmark.realtime {
offset = options[:offset] || 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File mail_backend.rb
has 382 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'mail'
require 'mapi/msg'
require 'mapi/convert'
require 'config_helper'
require 'alaveteli_file_types'
File incoming_message.rb
has 379 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'rexml/document'
require 'zip'
class IncomingMessage < ApplicationRecord
include MessageProminence
Method search
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search
# TODO: Why is this so complicated with arrays and stuff? Look at the route
# in config/routes.rb for comments.
combined = params[:combined].split("/")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class IncomingMessage
has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class IncomingMessage < ApplicationRecord
include MessageProminence
include CacheAttributesFromRawEmail
include Taggable
Class ApplicationController
has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
class PermissionDenied < StandardError
end
class RouteNotFound < StandardError
Method world_foi_websites
has 115 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.world_foi_websites
world_foi_websites = [
{ name: "WhatDoTheyKnow",
country_name: "United Kingdom",
country_iso_code: "GB",
Method permanently_failed_addresses
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.permanently_failed_addresses(message)
if MailHandler.empty_return_path?(message)
# Some sort of auto-response
# Check for Exim’s X-Failed-Recipients header
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class UserController
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class UserController < ApplicationController
include UserSpamCheck
skip_before_action :html_response, only: [
:show, :wall, :get_draft_profile_photo, :get_profile_photo
Class InfoRequest
has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class InfoRequest
module State
module Transitions
# Returns a label for the given state, suitable for using in a form to
# update the status of a request.
Class RequestController
has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class RequestController < ApplicationController
skip_before_action :html_response, only: [:show, :select_authorities]
before_action :check_read_only, only: [:new, :upload_response]
before_action :set_render_recaptcha, only: [ :new ]
Method new
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new
# All new requests are of normal_sort
unless params[:outgoing_message].nil?
params[:outgoing_message][:what_doing] = 'normal_sort'
end
File application_controller.rb
has 336 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
class PermissionDenied < StandardError
end
class RouteNotFound < StandardError