Sign upLogin

neo4jrb/neo4j

View on GitHub
Star
lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

File query_clauses.rb has 584 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module ActiveGraph
  module Core
    module QueryClauses
      class ArgError < StandardError
        attr_reader :arg_part
Severity: Major
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 1 day to fix

Class Clause has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      class Clause
        UNDERSCORE = '_'
        COMMA_SPACE = ', '
        AND = ' AND '
        PRETTY_NEW_LINE = "\n  "
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Method value has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def value
          return @value if @value

          [String, Symbol, Integer, Hash, NilClass].each do |arg_class|
            from_method = "from_#{arg_class.name.downcase}"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method clause_strings has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def clause_strings(clauses)
            clauses.flat_map do |clause|
              Array(clause.value).map do |v|
                (clause.options[:not] ? 'NOT' : '') + (v.to_s.match(PAREN_SURROUND_REGEX) ? v.to_s : "(#{v})")
              end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method key_value_string has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def key_value_string(key, value, previous_keys = [], is_set = false)
          param = (previous_keys << key).join(UNDERSCORE)
          self.class.paramaterize_key!(param)

          if value.is_a?(Range)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method hash_key_value_string has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def hash_key_value_string(key, value, previous_keys)
          value.map do |k, v|
            if k.to_sym == :neo_id
              v = Array(v).map { |item| (item.respond_to?(:neo_id) ? item.neo_id : item).to_i }
              key_value_string("ID(#{key})", v)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method format_label has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def format_label(label_arg)
          return label_arg.map { |arg| format_label(arg) }.join if label_arg.is_a?(Array)

          label_arg = label_arg.to_s.strip
          if !label_arg.empty? && label_arg[0] != ':'
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method from_args has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def from_args(args, params, options = {})
            query_string, params_arg = args

            if query_string.is_a?(String) && (query_string.match(ARG_HAS_QUESTION_MARK_REGEX) || params_arg.is_a?(Hash))
              if params_arg.is_a?(Hash)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method from_key_and_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def from_key_and_value(key, value)
          case value
          when String, Symbol
            self.class.from_key_and_single_value(key, value)
          when Array
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Use match? instead of match when MatchData is not used.
Open

                (clause.options[:not] ? 'NOT' : '') + (v.to_s.match(PAREN_SURROUND_REGEX) ? v.to_s : "(#{v})")
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb by rubocop

In Ruby 2.4, String#match?, Regexp#match? and Symbol#match? have been added. The methods are faster than match. Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData object or saving backref. So, when MatchData is not used, use match? instead of match.

Example:

# bad
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match?(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something(Regexp.last_match)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something($~)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something($~)
  end
end

Use match? instead of =~ when MatchData is not used.
Open

            if value.to_s =~ /^{.+}$/
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb by rubocop

In Ruby 2.4, String#match?, Regexp#match? and Symbol#match? have been added. The methods are faster than match. Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData object or saving backref. So, when MatchData is not used, use match? instead of match.

Example:

# bad
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match?(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something(Regexp.last_match)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something($~)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something($~)
  end
end

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        class << self
          def clause_strings(clauses)
            result_clause = clauses.last

            clauses[0..-2].map(&:param_vars_added).flatten.grep(/^skip_\d+$/).each do |var|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb on lines 550..558

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        class << self
          def clause_strings(clauses)
            result_clause = clauses.last

            clauses[0..-2].map(&:param_vars_added).flatten.grep(/^limit_\d+$/).each do |var|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb on lines 578..586

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Missing magic comment # frozen_string_literal: true.
Open

module ActiveGraph
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/active_graph/core/query_clauses.rb by rubocop

This cop is designed to help upgrade to Ruby 3.0. It will add the comment # frozen_string_literal: true to the top of files to enable frozen string literals. Frozen string literals may be default in Ruby 3.0. The comment will be added below a shebang and encoding comment. The frozen string literal comment is only valid in Ruby 2.3+.

Example: EnforcedStyle: when_needed (default)

# The `when_needed` style will add the frozen string literal comment
# to files only when the `TargetRubyVersion` is set to 2.3+.
# bad
module Foo
  # ...
end

# good
# frozen_string_literal: true

module Foo
  # ...
end

Example: EnforcedStyle: always

# The `always` style will always add the frozen string literal comment
# to a file, regardless of the Ruby version or if `freeze` or `<<` are
# called on a string literal.
# bad
module Bar
  # ...
end

# good
# frozen_string_literal: true

module Bar
  # ...
end

Example: EnforcedStyle: never

# The `never` will enforce that the frozen string literal comment does
# not exist in a file.
# bad
# frozen_string_literal: true

module Baz
  # ...
end

# good
module Baz
  # ...
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status