Class AssetType
has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AssetType
# The Asset Type encapsulates a type of attachment.
# Conventionally this would a sensible category like 'image' or 'video'
# that should be processed and presented in a particular way.
Cyclomatic complexity for initialize is too high. [8/6] Open
def initialize(name, options = {})
options = options.symbolize_keys
@name = name
@icon_name = options[:icon] || name
@processors = options[:processors] || []
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method define_radius_tags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def define_radius_tags
type = self.name
Page.class_eval {
tag "asset:if_#{type}" do |tag|
tag.expand if find_asset(tag, tag.attr.dup).send("#{type}?".to_sym)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Use delete
instead of gsub
. Open
Radiant::config["assets.additional_thumbnails"].to_s.gsub(' ','').split(',').collect{|s| s.split('=')}.inject({}) {|ha, (k, v)| ha[k.to_sym] = v; ha}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where gsub
can be replaced by
tr
or delete
.
Example:
# bad
'abc'.gsub('b', 'd')
'abc'.gsub('a', '')
'abc'.gsub(/a/, 'd')
'abc'.gsub!('a', 'd')
# good
'abc'.gsub(/.*/, 'a')
'abc'.gsub(/a+/, 'd')
'abc'.tr('b', 'd')
'a b c'.delete(' ')
TODO found Open
# TODO: should this default to an icon set?
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
#TODO: define permitted and/or expected options for the asset type and pass through that subset of the style-definition hash
- Exclude checks
Redundant use of Object#to_s
in interpolation. Open
return "/images/admin/assets/#{icon_name}_#{style_name.to_s}.png"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for string conversion in string interpolation, which is redundant.
Example:
# bad
"result is #{something.to_s}"
Example:
# good
"result is #{something}"
Redundant use of Object#to_s
in interpolation. Open
if File.exist?(Rails.root + "public/images/admin/assets/#{icon_name}_#{style_name.to_s}.png")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for string conversion in string interpolation, which is redundant.
Example:
# bad
"result is #{something.to_s}"
Example:
# good
"result is #{something}"
Use ==
if you meant to do a comparison or wrap the expression in parentheses to indicate you meant to assign in a condition. Open
@configured_styles ||= if style_definitions = Radiant.config["assets.thumbnails.#{name}"]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for assignments in the conditions of if/while/until.
Example:
# bad
if some_var = true
do_something
end
Example:
# good
if some_var == true
do_something
end
end
at 117, 10 is not aligned with if
at 113, 32. Open
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether the end keywords are aligned properly.
Three modes are supported through the EnforcedStyleAlignWith
configuration parameter:
If it's set to keyword
(which is the default), the end
shall be aligned with the start of the keyword (if, class, etc.).
If it's set to variable
the end
shall be aligned with the
left-hand-side of the variable assignment, if there is one.
If it's set to start_of_line
, the end
shall be aligned with the
start of the line where the matching keyword appears.
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: keyword (default)
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: startofline
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
puts(if true
end)
Use ==
if you meant to do a comparison or wrap the expression in parentheses to indicate you meant to assign in a condition. Open
if style = paperclip_styles[style_name.to_sym]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for assignments in the conditions of if/while/until.
Example:
# bad
if some_var = true
do_something
end
Example:
# good
if some_var == true
do_something
end
end
at 166, 10 is not aligned with if
at 159, 33. Open
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether the end keywords are aligned properly.
Three modes are supported through the EnforcedStyleAlignWith
configuration parameter:
If it's set to keyword
(which is the default), the end
shall be aligned with the start of the keyword (if, class, etc.).
If it's set to variable
the end
shall be aligned with the
left-hand-side of the variable assignment, if there is one.
If it's set to start_of_line
, the end
shall be aligned with the
start of the line where the matching keyword appears.
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: keyword (default)
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: startofline
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
puts(if true
end)