Sign upLogin

nofxx/georuby

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 91 of 91 total issues

Method parse_geometry has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def parse_geometry(srid_allowed)
        token = @tokenizer_structure.get_next_token
        if token == 'SRID'
          # SRID present
          fail EWKTFormatError.new('SRID not allowed at this position') unless srid_allowed
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/geo_ruby/ewk/ewkt_parser.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method ellipsoidal_distance has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def ellipsoidal_distance(point, a = 6_378_137.0, b = 6_356_752.3142)
        f = (a - b) / a
        l = (point.lon - lon) * DEG2RAD

        u1 = Math.atan((1 - f) * Math.tan(lat * DEG2RAD))
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/point.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method parse_coords has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def parse_coords
        coords = []
        x = @tokenizer_structure.get_next_token
        y = @tokenizer_structure.get_next_token
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/geo_ruby/ewk/ewkt_parser.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method as_georss has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def as_georss(options = {})
        dialect = options[:dialect] || :simple
        case (dialect)
        when :simple
          geom_attr = ''
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/geometry.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method as_georss has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def as_georss(options = {})
        dialect = options[:dialect] || :simple
        case (dialect)
        when :simple
          geom_attr = ''
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/envelope.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method parse_geometry has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def parse_geometry
        @unpack_structure.endianness = @unpack_structure.read_byte
        geometry_type = @unpack_structure.read_uint

        if (geometry_type & Z_MASK) != 0
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/geo_ruby/ewk/ewkb_parser.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method commit_add has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def commit_add(index)
        max_x, min_x, max_y, min_y, max_z, min_z, max_m, min_m = @shp.xmax, @shp.xmin, @shp.ymax, @shp.ymin, @shp.zmax, @shp.zmin, @shp.mmax, @shp.mmin
        @added.each do |record|
          @dbf_io << ['20'].pack('H2')
          @dbf.fields.each do |field|
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method commit_delete has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def commit_delete
        @shp_r.rewind
        header = @shp_r.read(100)
        @shp_io << header
        @shx_io << header
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      str << [geometry.length, geometry.reduce(0) { |a, e| a + e.length }].pack('V2')
          str << geometry.reduce([0]) do |a, e|
            a << (a.last + e.length) # last element of the previous array is dropped
          end.pack("V#{geometry.length}")
          geometry.each do |ls|
            Severity: Major
            Found in lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb on lines 646..655

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 54.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      str << [geometry.length,
            geometry.reduce(0) { |a, e| a + e.length }
          ].pack('V2')
          # last element of the previous array is dropped
          str << geometry.reduce([0]) do |a, e|
            Severity: Major
            Found in lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb on lines 614..620

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 54.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Method parse has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def parse(kml)
      @factory.reset
      @with_z = false
      @parser = REXML::Parsers::PullParser.new(kml)
      while @parser.has_next?
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/geo_ruby/kml.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Method bounding_box has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                    def bounding_box
        max_x, min_x, max_y, min_y = -Float::MAX, Float::MAX, -Float::MAX, Float::MAX
        if with_z
          max_z, min_z = -Float::MAX, Float::MAX
          each do |geometry|
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/geometry_collection.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                Method build_polygon has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                      def build_polygon(geometry, str)
        if geometry.is_a? GeoRuby::SimpleFeatures::Polygon
          str << [geometry.length,
            geometry.reduce(0) { |a, e| a + e.length }
          ].pack('V2')
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def m_range
        if with_m
          max_m, min_m = -Float::MAX, Float::MAX
          each do |lr|
            lrmr = lr.m_range
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/polygon.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                  lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/geometry_collection.rb on lines 52..62

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 48.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def m_range
        if with_m
          max_m, min_m = -Float::MAX, Float::MAX
          each do |lr|
            lrmr = lr.m_range
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/geometry_collection.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                  lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/polygon.rb on lines 41..51

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 48.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Method commit_finalize has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def commit_finalize(min_x, max_x, min_y, max_y, min_z, max_z, min_m, max_m)
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/geo_ruby/shp4r/shp.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                    Method m_range has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                          def m_range
        if with_m
          max_m, min_m = -Float::MAX, Float::MAX
          each do |point|
            max_m = point.m if point.m.to_f > max_m
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/line_string.rb - About 45 mins to fix

                    Cognitive Complexity

                    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                    Further reading

                    Method == has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                          def ==(other_polygon)
        if other_polygon.class != self.class ||
           length != other_polygon.length
          false
        else
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in lib/geo_ruby/simple_features/polygon.rb - About 45 mins to fix

                    Cognitive Complexity

                    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                    Further reading

                    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                    Open

                            elsif gml =~ /^<\s*[^:>]*:Polygon\s*>/
          if gml =~ /<\s*[^:>]*:posList\s*>([^<]*)/
            xy = Regexp.last_match[1].split(' ')
            @geometry = Polygon.new
            linear_ring = LinearRing.new
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in lib/geo_ruby/georss.rb - About 45 mins to fix

                      Method parse_multi_point has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                            def parse_multi_point
        if @tokenizer_structure.get_next_token != '('
          fail EWKTFormatError.new('Invalid MultiPoint')
        end
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in lib/geo_ruby/ewk/ewkt_parser.rb - About 45 mins to fix

                      Cognitive Complexity

                      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                      Further reading

                      Severity
                      Category
                      Status
                      Source
                      Language