Sign upLogin

norman/friendly_id

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 8 of 8 total issues

Method find has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def find(*args, allow_nil: false)
      id = args.first
      return super(*args) if args.count != 1 || id.unfriendly_id?
      first_by_friendly_id(id).tap { |result| return result unless result.nil? }
      return super(*args) if potential_primary_key?(id)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/friendly_id/finder_methods.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_slug has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def create_slug
      return unless friendly_id
      return if history_is_up_to_date?
      # Allow reversion back to a previously used slug
      relation = slugs.where(slug: friendly_id)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/friendly_id/history.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def initialize(scope, slug, slug_column, sequence_separator, base_class)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/friendly_id/sequentially_slugged/calculator.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Method to_candidate_array has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def to_candidate_array(object, array)
      array.map do |candidate|
        case candidate
        when String
          [-> { candidate }]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/friendly_id/candidates.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    group :development, :test do
  platforms :jruby do
    gem "activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter", "~> 61.0"
    gem "activerecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter", "~> 61.0"
    gem "kramdown"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.0.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.0.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.1.rb on lines 9..20

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    group :development, :test do
  platforms :jruby do
    gem "activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter", "~> 61.0"
    gem "activerecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter", "~> 61.0"
    gem "kramdown"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.1.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.0.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.0.rb on lines 9..20

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    group :development, :test do
  platforms :jruby do
    gem "activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter", "~> 61.0"
    gem "activerecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter", "~> 61.0"
    gem "kramdown"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.0.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.0.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.1.rb on lines 9..20

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    group :development, :test do
  platforms :jruby do
    gem "activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter", "~> 51.1"
    gem "activerecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter", "~> 51.1"
    gem "kramdown"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.0.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.0.rb on lines 9..20
    gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-7.1.rb on lines 9..20

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 30.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language