Showing 69 of 69 total issues
Function setFavicon
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var setFavicon = function(count) {
if (count !== unread_count) {
unread_count = count;
var title = "Octobox";
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while ( $.inArray(getIdsFromRows(current)[0], ids) > -1 && current.next().length > 0) {
current = current.next();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while ( $.inArray(getIdsFromRows(current)[0], ids) > -1 && current.prev().length > 0) {
current = current.prev();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method results
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def results
res = scope
res = scope.search_by_subject_title(parsed_query.freetext) if parsed_query.freetext.present?
res = res.repo(repo) if repo.present?
res = res.exclude_repo(exclude_repo) if exclude_repo.present?
Method current_notifications
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def current_notifications(scope = notifications_for_presentation)
[:repo, :reason, :type, :unread, :owner, :state, :number, :author, :is_private, :status, :draft].each do |sub_scope|
next unless params[sub_scope].present?
# This cast is required due to a bug in type casting
# TODO: Rails 5.2 was supposed to fix this:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sync
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync(remote_subject)
update({
repository_full_name: extract_full_name_from_remote_subject(remote_subject),
github_id: remote_subject['id'],
state: remote_subject['merged_at'].present? ? 'merged' : remote_subject['state'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method download_reviews
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def download_reviews
return [] unless github_client && pull_request?
reviews = github_client.get(url + '/reviews', since: comments.order('created_at ASC').last.try(:created_at))
return [] unless reviews.present?
reviews.map { |review|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sidebar_filter_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sidebar_filter_link(active:, param:, value:, count: nil, except: nil, link_class: nil, path_params: nil, title: nil)
css_class = 'nav-item'
css_class += ' active' if active
css_class += " #{param}-#{value}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_notifications
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_notifications(notifications)
return if notifications.blank?
eager_load_relation = Octobox.config.subjects_enabled? ? [:subject, :repository, :app_installation] : nil
existing_notifications = user.notifications.includes(eager_load_relation).where(github_id: notifications.map(&:id))
notifications.each do |notification|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method expand_comments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def expand_comments
scope = notifications_for_presentation.newest
scope = load_and_count_notifications(scope) unless request.xhr?
ids = scope.pluck(:id)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
case event_header
when 'issues', 'issue_comment'
SyncSubjectWorker.perform_async_if_configured(payload['issue'])
when 'pull_request'
Method apply_plan
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.apply_plan(subscriber_names, plan_name)
plan = SubscriptionPlan.find_by_name(plan_name)
return Rails.logger.info("n\n\033[32m[#{Time.current}] ERROR -- Could not find plan named #{plan_name}\033[0m\n\n") if plan.nil?
current_subs_purchases = plan.subscription_purchases.where(unit_count: 1) unless plan.nil?
Method generate
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate
puts "Updating the repository"
system("git fetch origin master 2>&1 > /dev/null")
puts "=" * 80
Method perform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform(user_id)
user = User.find_by(id: user_id)
return unless user.present?
return unless user.effective_access_token.present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function enablePopOvers
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var enablePopOvers = function() {
var showTimer;
$('[data-toggle="popover"]').popover({ trigger: "manual" , html: true})
.on("mouseenter", function () {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var nextPage = function() {
nextPageButton = $(".page-item:last-child .page-link[rel=next]");
if (nextPageButton.length) window.location.href = nextPageButton.attr('href');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var prevPage = function() {
previousPageButton = $(".page-item:first-child .page-link[rel=prev]")
if (previousPageButton.length) window.location.href = previousPageButton.attr('href');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(query)
query = query.to_s
@operators = {}
ss = StringScanner.new(query)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_unread_state
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_unread_state(notifications)
return if notifications.blank?
existing_notifications = user.notifications.where(github_id: notifications.map(&:id)).select('id, github_id, unread')
notifications.each do |notification|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var unarchiveSelected = function(){
if (getDisplayedRows().length === 0) return;
var ids = getIdsFromRows(getMarkedOrCurrentRows());
archive(ids, false);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76