Showing 28 of 28 total issues
Method coerce_and_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def coerce_and_validate(value, schema, parent_all_of: false, parent_discriminator_schemas: [], discriminator_property_name: nil)
return OpenAPIParser::ValidateError.build_error_result(value, schema) unless value.kind_of?(Hash)
properties = schema.properties || {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method coerce_and_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def coerce_and_validate(value, schema, **keyword_args)
if value.nil? && schema.nullable
return [value, nil]
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method coerce_and_validate
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def coerce_and_validate(value, schema, parent_all_of: false, parent_discriminator_schemas: [], discriminator_property_name: nil)
return OpenAPIParser::ValidateError.build_error_result(value, schema) unless value.kind_of?(Hash)
properties = schema.properties || {}
Method find_object
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_object(reference)
return self if object_reference == reference
remote_reference = !reference.start_with?('#')
return find_remote_object(reference) if remote_reference
return nil unless reference.start_with?(object_reference)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method coerce_and_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def coerce_and_validate(value, schema, **_keyword_args)
return OpenAPIParser::ValidateError.build_error_result(value, schema) unless value.kind_of?(String)
value, err = check_enum_include(value, schema)
return [nil, err] if err
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(value, schema)
reference = schema.object_reference
if schema.minimum
if schema.exclusiveMinimum && value <= schema.minimum
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method expand_list_objects
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def expand_list_objects(root, attribute_names, validate_references)
return unless attribute_names
attribute_names.each do |name|
l = send(name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_max_min_items(value, schema)
return [nil, OpenAPIParser::MoreThanMaxItems.new(value, schema.object_reference)] if schema.maxItems && value.length > schema.maxItems
return [nil, OpenAPIParser::LessThanMinItems.new(value, schema.object_reference)] if schema.minItems && value.length < schema.minItems
[value, nil]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_max_min_length(value, schema)
return [nil, OpenAPIParser::MoreThanMaxLength.new(value, schema.object_reference)] if schema.maxLength && value.size > schema.maxLength
return [nil, OpenAPIParser::LessThanMinLength.new(value, schema.object_reference)] if schema.minLength && value.size < schema.minLength
[value, nil]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method parse_path_parameters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_path_parameters(schema_path, request_path)
parameters = path_parameters(schema_path)
return nil if parameters.empty?
# If there are regex special characters in the path, the regex will
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_parameter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_parameter(parameters_hash, params, object_reference, options, is_header = false)
no_exist_required_key = []
params_key_converted = params.keys.map { |k| [convert_key(k, is_header), k] }.to_h
parameters_hash.each do |k, v|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method expand_objects
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def expand_objects(root, attribute_names, validate_references)
return unless attribute_names
attribute_names.each do |name|
v = send(name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_parameter
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_parameter(parameters_hash, params, object_reference, options, is_header = false)
Method select_media_type_from_content
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select_media_type_from_content(content_type, content)
return nil unless content_type
return nil unless content
if (media_type = content[content_type])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method coerce_and_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def coerce_and_validate(value, schema, **_keyword_args)
return OpenAPIParser::ValidateError.build_error_result(value, schema) unless value.kind_of?(Array)
value, err = validate_max_min_items(value, schema)
return [nil, err] if err
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return [nil, err] if err
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return [nil, err] if err
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return child
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return [nil, OpenAPIParser::NotExistRequiredKey.new(required_set.to_a, schema.object_reference)] unless required_set.empty?
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return media_type