Sign upLogin

piotrmurach/strings-case

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 8 of 8 total issues

Method split_into_words has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def split_into_words(string, acronyms: nil, sep: nil)
      words = []
      word = []
      scanner = StringScanner.new(string)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/strings/case.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method split_into_words has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def split_into_words(string, acronyms: nil, sep: nil)
      words = []
      word = []
      scanner = StringScanner.new(string)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/strings/case.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
    Open

              if scanner.pos == 1 && char == sep
            words << ""
          elsif scanner.eos? && char == sep
            word = [""]
          else
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/strings/case.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
      Open

                words << word.join unless word.empty?
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/strings/case.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def camelcase(string, acronyms: config.acronyms, separator: "")
      acronyms = Acronyms.from(acronyms)
      parsecase(string, acronyms: acronyms, sep: separator) do |word, i|
        acronyms.fetch(word) || (i.zero? ? word.downcase : word.capitalize)
      end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/strings/case.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/strings/case.rb on lines 272..276

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 31.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def sentencecase(string, acronyms: config.acronyms, separator: " ")
      acronyms = Acronyms.from(acronyms)
      parsecase(string, acronyms: acronyms, sep: separator) do |word, i|
        acronyms.fetch(word) || (i.zero? ? word.capitalize : word.downcase)
      end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/strings/case.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/strings/case.rb on lines 136..140

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 31.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def titlecase(string, acronyms: config.acronyms, separator: " ")
      acronyms = Acronyms.from(acronyms)
      parsecase(string, acronyms: acronyms, sep: separator) do |word|
        acronyms.fetch(word) || word.capitalize
      end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/strings/case.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
        lib/strings/case.rb on lines 226..230

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 26.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def pascalcase(string, acronyms: config.acronyms, separator: "")
      acronyms = Acronyms.from(acronyms)
      parsecase(string, acronyms: acronyms, sep: separator) do |word|
        acronyms.fetch(word) || word.capitalize
      end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/strings/case.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
        lib/strings/case.rb on lines 321..325

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 26.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language