File notes_controller.rb
has 427 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class NotesController < ApplicationController
respond_to :html
before_action :require_user, only: %i(create edit update delete rsvp publish_draft)
before_action :set_node, only: %i(show)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
@node = Node.find(params[:id])
if current_user.uid == @node.uid || current_user.admin? || @node.has_tag("with:#{current_user.username}")
@revision = @node.latest
@revision.title = params[:title]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
return show_banned_flash unless current_user.status == User::Status::NORMAL
saved, @node, @revision = new_note
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class NotesController
has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class NotesController < ApplicationController
respond_to :html
before_action :require_user, only: %i(create edit update delete rsvp publish_draft)
before_action :set_node, only: %i(show)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method edit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def edit
@node = Node.find_by(nid: params[:id], type: 'note')
if @node
if current_user.uid == @node.uid || current_user.admin? || @node.has_tag("with:#{current_user.username}")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
return show_banned_flash unless current_user.status == User::Status::NORMAL
saved, @node, @revision = new_note
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method show
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
return if redirect_to_node_path?(@node)
if @node
if @node.has_power_tag('question') && @node.status == 1
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method update
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
@node = Node.find(params[:id])
if current_user.uid == @node.uid || current_user.admin? || @node.has_tag("with:#{current_user.username}")
@revision = @node.latest
@revision.title = params[:title]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method delete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete
@node = Node.find(params[:id])
if current_user && (current_user.uid == @node.uid || current_user.can_moderate?)
if @node.authors.uniq.length == 1
@node.destroy
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method show
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
return if redirect_to_node_path?(@node)
if @node
if @node.has_power_tag('question') && @node.status == 1
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method redirect_power_tag_redirect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def redirect_power_tag_redirect
if @node.has_power_tag('redirect') && @node.status == 1
if current_user.blank? || !current_user.can_moderate?
redirect_to URI.parse(Node.find(@node.power_tag('redirect')).path).path
elsif current_user.can_moderate?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Use 2 (not -4) spaces for indentation. Open
Node.where(path: "/map/#{params[:name]}/#{params[:date]}").first
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cops checks for indentation that doesn't use the specified number of spaces.
See also the IndentationConsistency cop which is the companion to this one.
Example:
# bad
class A
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
# good
class A
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
Example: IgnoredPatterns: ['^\s*module']
# bad
module A
class B
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
end
# good
module A
class B
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
end
Align elsif
with if
. Open
elsif params[:author] && params[:date] && params[:id]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cops checks the alignment of else keywords. Normally they should be aligned with an if/unless/while/until/begin/def keyword, but there are special cases when they should follow the same rules as the alignment of end.
Example:
# bad
if something
code
else
code
end
# bad
if something
code
elsif something
code
end
# good
if something
code
else
code
end
Align else
with if
. Open
else
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cops checks the alignment of else keywords. Normally they should be aligned with an if/unless/while/until/begin/def keyword, but there are special cases when they should follow the same rules as the alignment of end.
Example:
# bad
if something
code
else
code
end
# bad
if something
code
elsif something
code
end
# good
if something
code
else
code
end
Trailing whitespace detected. Open
revision['timestamp'] = DateTime.now.to_i # odd assignment needed due to legacy Drupal column types
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks