Method tagNearbyPeople
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagNearbyPeople(coordinates, tag, field, period = nil, sort_by = nil, order_direction = nil, limit = 10)
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlng"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selng"].nil?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tagNearbyNodes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagNearbyNodes(coordinates, tag, period = { "from" => nil, "to" => nil }, sort_by = nil, order_direction = nil, limit = 10)
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlng"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selng"].nil?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tagNearbyPeople
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagNearbyPeople(coordinates, tag, field, period = nil, sort_by = nil, order_direction = nil, limit = 10)
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlng"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selng"].nil?
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method tagNearbyNodes
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagNearbyNodes(coordinates, tag, period = { "from" => nil, "to" => nil }, sort_by = nil, order_direction = nil, limit = 10)
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["nwlng"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selat"].nil?
raise("Must contain all four coordinates") if coordinates["selng"].nil?
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method tagNearbyPeople
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagNearbyPeople(coordinates, tag, field, period = nil, sort_by = nil, order_direction = nil, limit = 10)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method tagNearbyNodes
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagNearbyNodes(coordinates, tag, period = { "from" => nil, "to" => nil }, sort_by = nil, order_direction = nil, limit = 10)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method find_users
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_users(query, limit, type = nil)
users = if type == 'tag'
User.where('rusers.status = 1')
.joins(:user_tags)\
.where('user_tags.value LIKE ?', "%#{query}%")\
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Use tr
instead of gsub
. Open
tags_order = 'CASE WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 1 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 2 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 4 ELSE 3 END', "#{query}", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}", "#{query}%", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}%", "%#{query}", "%#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where gsub
can be replaced by
tr
or delete
.
Example:
# bad
'abc'.gsub('b', 'd')
'abc'.gsub('a', '')
'abc'.gsub(/a/, 'd')
'abc'.gsub!('a', 'd')
# good
'abc'.gsub(/.*/, 'a')
'abc'.gsub(/a+/, 'd')
'abc'.tr('b', 'd')
'a b c'.delete(' ')
Use tr
instead of gsub
. Open
tags_order = 'CASE WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 1 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 2 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 4 ELSE 3 END', "#{query}", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}", "#{query}%", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}%", "%#{query}", "%#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where gsub
can be replaced by
tr
or delete
.
Example:
# bad
'abc'.gsub('b', 'd')
'abc'.gsub('a', '')
'abc'.gsub(/a/, 'd')
'abc'.gsub!('a', 'd')
# good
'abc'.gsub(/.*/, 'a')
'abc'.gsub(/a+/, 'd')
'abc'.tr('b', 'd')
'a b c'.delete(' ')
Use tr
instead of gsub
. Open
Tag.where('name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ?', "%#{query}%", "%#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}%")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where gsub
can be replaced by
tr
or delete
.
Example:
# bad
'abc'.gsub('b', 'd')
'abc'.gsub('a', '')
'abc'.gsub(/a/, 'd')
'abc'.gsub!('a', 'd')
# good
'abc'.gsub(/.*/, 'a')
'abc'.gsub(/a+/, 'd')
'abc'.tr('b', 'd')
'a b c'.delete(' ')
Use tr
instead of gsub
. Open
tags_order = 'CASE WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 1 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 2 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 4 ELSE 3 END', "#{query}", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}", "#{query}%", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}%", "%#{query}", "%#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where gsub
can be replaced by
tr
or delete
.
Example:
# bad
'abc'.gsub('b', 'd')
'abc'.gsub('a', '')
'abc'.gsub(/a/, 'd')
'abc'.gsub!('a', 'd')
# good
'abc'.gsub(/.*/, 'a')
'abc'.gsub(/a+/, 'd')
'abc'.tr('b', 'd')
'a b c'.delete(' ')
Prefer to_s
over string interpolation. Open
tags_order = 'CASE WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 1 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 2 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 4 ELSE 3 END', "#{query}", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}", "#{query}%", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}%", "%#{query}", "%#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for strings that are just an interpolated expression.
Example:
# bad
"#{@var}"
# good
@var.to_s
# good if @var is already a String
@var
Trailing whitespace detected. Open
# order tag autosuggestions by placing exact match of the tag on the top, then tags with query and some other text as suffix,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Use empty lines between method definitions. Open
def search_content(query, limit)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether method definitions are separated by one empty line.
NumberOfEmptyLines
can be and integer (e.g. 1 by default) or
an array (e.g. [1, 2]) to specificy a minimum and a maximum of
empty lines.
AllowAdjacentOneLineDefs
can be used to configure is adjacent
one line methods definitions are an offense
Example:
# bad
def a
end
def b
end
Example:
# good
def a
end
def b
end
Prefer to_s
over string interpolation. Open
tags_order = 'CASE WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 1 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 2 WHEN name LIKE ? OR name LIKE ? THEN 4 ELSE 3 END', "#{query}", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}", "#{query}%", "#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}%", "%#{query}", "%#{query.to_s.gsub(' ', '-')}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for strings that are just an interpolated expression.
Example:
# bad
"#{@var}"
# good
@var.to_s
# good if @var is already a String
@var