Showing 157 of 839 total issues
Function Fmt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def Fmt(obj, fmt=0):
if isinstance(obj, (list, tuple, dict)):
n = len(obj)
if isinstance(obj, list):
ldelim = '['
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pDiff
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pDiff(self, A: _mv.Mv, coord: Union[List, Symbol]) -> _mv.Mv:
"""
Compute partial derivative of multivector function 'A' with
respect to coordinate 'coord'.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _print_Symbol
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _print_Symbol(self, expr, style='plain'):
def str_symbol(name_str):
def translate(s):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function symbols_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def symbols_list(s, indices=None, sub=True, commutative=False):
"""
Convert a string to a list of symbols.
If :class:`galgebra.printer.Eprint` is enabled, the symbol names will
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Mul
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def Mul(dopl, dopr, op='*'): # General multiplication of Dop's
# cmpflg is True if the Dop operates on the left argument and
# False if the Dop operates on the right argument
if isinstance(dopl, Dop) and isinstance(dopr, Dop):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Dop
has 30 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Dop(dop._BaseDop):
r"""
Differential operator class for multivectors. The operators are of
the form
Function characterise_Mv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def characterise_Mv(self) -> None:
if self.char_Mv:
return
obj = expand(self.obj)
if isinstance(obj, numbers.Number):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function signature
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def signature(self):
if self.is_ortho:
p = 0
q = 0
for i in self.n_range:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, *args, ga, recp=None, coords=None, **kwargs):
"""
__init__(self, *args, ga, recp=None, **kwargs)
Note this constructor is overloaded, based on the type and number of
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Dop_mv_expand
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def Dop_mv_expand(self, modes=None) -> List[Tuple[Expr, Expr]]:
coefs = []
bases = []
self.consolidate_coefs()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File dop.py
has 304 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"""
Differential operators, for all sympy expressions
For multivector-customized differential operators, see :class:`galgebra.mv.Dop`.
"""
Function tex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tex(paper=(14, 11), debug=False, prog=False, pt='10pt'):
r"""
Post processes LaTeX output (see comments below), adds preamble and
postscript.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __call__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __call__(self, v, obj=False):
r"""
Returns the image of the multivector :math:`A` under the linear transformation :math:`L`.
:math:`{{L}\lp {A} \rp }` is defined by the linearity of :math:`L`, the
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exp(self, hint: str = '-') -> 'Mv': # Calculate exponential of multivector
"""
Only works if square of multivector is a scalar. If square is a
number we can determine if square is > or < zero and hence if
one should use trig or hyperbolic functions in expansion. If
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compare
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare(A: Mv, B: Mv) -> Union[Expr, int]:
"""
Determine if ``B = c*A`` where c is a scalar. If true return c
otherwise return 0.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function metric_symbols_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def metric_symbols_list(self, s=None): # input metric tensor as string
"""
rows of metric tensor are separated by "," and elements
of each row separated by " ". If the input is a single
row it is assummed that the metric tensor is diagonal.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function reverse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reverse(self, A: Expr) -> Expr: # Calculates reverse of A (see documentation)
A = expand(A)
blades = {}
if isinstance(A, Add):
args = A.args
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _of_basis_blades_ortho
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _of_basis_blades_ortho(self, blade1: Symbol, blade2: Symbol):
# dot (|), left (<), and right (>) products
# dot product for orthogonal basis
index1 = self._ga.indexes_to_blades_dict.inverse[blade1]
index2 = self._ga.indexes_to_blades_dict.inverse[blade2]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _latex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _latex(self, print_obj):
if self.nargs <= 1:
return print_obj._print(self.fvalue)
expr_lst = Mlt.expand_expr(self.fvalue, self.Ga)
latex_str = '\\begin{aligned} '
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function reduce_basis_loop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reduce_basis_loop(g, blst):
r"""
blst is a list of integers :math:`[i_{1},\ldots,i_{r}]` representing the geometric
product of r basis vectors :math:`a_{{i_1}}\cdots a_{{i_r}}`. :meth:`reduce_basis_loop`
searches along the list :math:`[i_{1},\ldots,i_{r}]` untill it finds :math:`i_{j} = i_{j+1}`
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"