Sign upLogin

rakuten-ws/rws-ruby-sdk

View on GitHub
Star
lib/rakuten_web_service/books/game.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
35 mins
Test Coverage
A
100%

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

module RakutenWebService
  module Books
    class Game < Books::Resource
      endpoint 'https://app.rakuten.co.jp/services/api/BooksGame/Search/20170404'
Severity: Major
Found in lib/rakuten_web_service/books/game.rb and 3 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
lib/rakuten_web_service/books/dvd.rb on lines 5..23
lib/rakuten_web_service/books/foreign_book.rb on lines 5..22
lib/rakuten_web_service/books/software.rb on lines 5..23

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 35.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Missing top-level class documentation comment.
Open

    class Game < Books::Resource
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/rakuten_web_service/books/game.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for missing top-level documentation of classes and modules. Classes with no body are exempt from the check and so are namespace modules - modules that have nothing in their bodies except classes, other modules, or constant definitions.

The documentation requirement is annulled if the class or module has a "#:nodoc:" comment next to it. Likewise, "#:nodoc: all" does the same for all its children.

Example:

# bad
class Person
  # ...
end

# good
# Description/Explanation of Person class
class Person
  # ...
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status