Showing 21,757 of 21,757 total issues
File exe.rb
has 1416 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf
module Util
#
# The class provides methods for creating and encoding executable file
# formats for various platforms. It is a replacement for the previous
File client.rb
has 1386 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Rex
module Proto
module SMB
class Client
File modules.rb
has 1365 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf
module Ui
module Console
module CommandDispatcher
Method run
has 714 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
print_status("Running MS SQL Server Enumeration...")
if session
set_session(session.client)
else
Method run_host
has 709 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run_host(ip)
begin
snmp = connect_snmp
File core.rb
has 1333 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'set'
require 'rex/post/meterpreter'
require 'rex'
module Rex
File constants.rb
has 1171 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Rex
module Proto
module SMB
class Constants
Method run
has 602 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
return if not check_dependencies
begin
# Get all values from v$parameter
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def make_pdf(ttf, js)
#swf_name = rand_text_alpha(8 + rand(8)) + ".swf"
xref = []
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 716.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def make_pdf(ttf, js)
#swf_name = rand_text_alpha(8 + rand(8)) + ".swf"
xref = []
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 716.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method run_host
has a Cognitive Complexity of 143 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run_host(ip)
begin
snmp = connect_snmp
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method html_get_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 138 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def html_get_hash(arg = {})
ntlm_ver = arg[:ntlm_ver]
if ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE or ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_2_SESSION_RESPONSE
lm_hash = arg[:lm_hash]
nt_hash = arg[:nt_hash]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mssql_get_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 135 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_get_hash(arg = {})
ntlm_ver = arg[:ntlm_ver]
if ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE or ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_2_SESSION_RESPONSE
lm_hash = arg[:lm_hash]
nt_hash = arg[:nt_hash]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File rdp.rb
has 1073 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf
###
#
# This module exposes methods for interacting with a remote RDP service
Method cmd_wmap_run
has 541 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cmd_wmap_run(*args)
# Stop everything
self.masstop = false
self.killwhenstop = true
File windows_secrets_dump.rb
has 1041 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'ruby_smb/dcerpc/client'
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Auxiliary
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::SMB::Client::Authenticated
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::DCERPC
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@@target_uuids = [
[ '00000131-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
[ '00000134-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
[ '00000136-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
[ '00000143-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 647.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@@target_uuids = [
[ '00000131-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
[ '00000134-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
[ '00000136-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
[ '00000143-0000-0000-c000-000000000046', '0.0' ],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 647.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 129 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
@show_progress = datastore['ShowProgress']
@show_percent = datastore['ShowProgressPercent'].to_i
if self.respond_to?(:session) && session
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File rpc_db.rb
has 1013 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf
module RPC
class RPC_Db < RPC_Base
private