File client.rb
has 637 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'rex/encoder/ndr'
require 'recog'
module Msf
module Exploit::Remote::SMB
Method smb_fingerprint_windows_lang
has 134 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_fingerprint_windows_lang
#
# Remote language detection via Print Providers
# Credit: http://immunityinc.com/downloads/Remote_Language_Detection_in_Immunity_CANVAS.odt
Method smb_fingerprint_windows_lang
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_fingerprint_windows_lang
#
# Remote language detection via Print Providers
# Credit: http://immunityinc.com/downloads/Remote_Language_Detection_in_Immunity_CANVAS.odt
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method smb_fingerprint_windows_sp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_fingerprint_windows_sp(os)
sp = ''
if (os == 'Windows XP')
# SRVSVC was blocked in SP2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method smb_fingerprint_windows_sp
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_fingerprint_windows_sp(os)
sp = ''
if (os == 'Windows XP')
# SRVSVC was blocked in SP2
Method smb_srvsvc_netshareenumall
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_srvsvc_netshareenumall
shares = []
simple.connect("\\\\#{rhost}\\IPC$")
handle = dcerpc_handle('4b324fc8-1670-01d3-1278-5a47bf6ee188', '3.0', 'ncacn_np', ["\\srvsvc"])
begin
Method initialize
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super
register_evasion_options(
[
Method smb_srvsvc_netshareenumall
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_srvsvc_netshareenumall
shares = []
simple.connect("\\\\#{rhost}\\IPC$")
handle = dcerpc_handle('4b324fc8-1670-01d3-1278-5a47bf6ee188', '3.0', 'ncacn_np', ["\\srvsvc"])
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method connect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def connect(global=true, versions: [], backend: nil)
if versions.nil? || versions.empty?
versions = datastore['SMB::ProtocolVersion'].split(',').map(&:strip).reject(&:blank?).map(&:to_i)
# if the user explicitly set the protocol version to 1, still use ruby_smb
backend ||= :ruby_smb if versions == [1]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method smb_login
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_login(simple_client = self.simple)
# Override the default RubySMB capabilities with Kerberos authentication
if datastore['SMB::Auth'] == Msf::Exploit::Remote::AuthOption::KERBEROS
fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'The Smb::Rhostname option is required when using Kerberos authentication.') if datastore['Smb::Rhostname'].blank?
fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'The SMBDomain option is required when using Kerberos authentication.') if datastore['SMBDomain'].blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method smb_srvsvc_netsharegetinfo
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_srvsvc_netsharegetinfo(share)
shares = []
simple.connect("\\\\#{rhost}\\IPC$")
handle = dcerpc_handle('4b324fc8-1670-01d3-1278-5a47bf6ee188', '3.0', 'ncacn_np', ["\\srvsvc"])
begin
Method smb_login
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_login(simple_client = self.simple)
# Override the default RubySMB capabilities with Kerberos authentication
if datastore['SMB::Auth'] == Msf::Exploit::Remote::AuthOption::KERBEROS
fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'The Smb::Rhostname option is required when using Kerberos authentication.') if datastore['Smb::Rhostname'].blank?
fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'The SMBDomain option is required when using Kerberos authentication.') if datastore['SMBDomain'].blank?
Method smb_lanman_netshareenumall
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_lanman_netshareenumall
shares = []
begin
# XXX: #trans is not supported by RubySMB
res = self.simple.client.trans(
Method smb_fingerprint
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_fingerprint
fprint = {}
# Connect to the server if needed
if not self.simple
Method smb_fingerprint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_fingerprint
fprint = {}
# Connect to the server if needed
if not self.simple
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return resp
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return nil if pcnt < 3
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return nil if bcnt > blen
Method smb_enumprintproviders
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_enumprintproviders
resp = smb_enumprinters(8, nil, 1, 0)
return nil if not resp
rptr, tmp, blen = resp.unpack("V*")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method smb_srvsvc_netsharegetinfo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def smb_srvsvc_netsharegetinfo(share)
shares = []
simple.connect("\\\\#{rhost}\\IPC$")
handle = dcerpc_handle('4b324fc8-1670-01d3-1278-5a47bf6ee188', '3.0', 'ncacn_np', ["\\srvsvc"])
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lerror, lconv, lentries, lcount = res['Payload'].to_s[
res['Payload'].v['ParamOffset'],
res['Payload'].v['ParamCount']
].unpack("v4")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76