rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

Method exploit has 326 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def exploit
    if is_root?
      fail_with Failure::BadConfig, 'Session already has root privileges'
    end

Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb - About 1 day to fix

    File rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb has 457 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Local
      Rank = GoodRanking
    
      include Msf::Post::File
      include Msf::Post::Solaris::Priv
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

      Method initialize has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def initialize(info = {})
          super(update_info(info,
            'Name'           => 'Solaris RSH Stack Clash Privilege Escalation',
            'Description'    => %q{
              This module exploits a vulnerability in RSH on unpatched Solaris
      Severity: Major
      Found in modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Method exploit has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def exploit
            if is_root?
              fail_with Failure::BadConfig, 'Session already has root privileges'
            end
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb - About 55 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method check has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def check
            unless setuid? rsh_path
              vprint_error "#{rsh_path} is not setuid"
              return CheckCode::Safe
            end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def upload_and_compile(path, data)
            upload "#{path}.c", data
        
            output = cmd_exec "PATH=$PATH:/usr/sfw/bin/:/opt/sfw/bin/:/opt/csw/bin gcc -Wall -std=gnu99 -o #{path} #{path}.c"
            unless output.blank?
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb and 3 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
        modules/exploits/solaris/local/extremeparr_dtappgather_priv_esc.rb on lines 115..124
        modules/exploits/solaris/local/libnspr_nspr_log_file_priv_esc.rb on lines 107..116
        modules/exploits/solaris/local/xscreensaver_log_priv_esc.rb on lines 102..111

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 32.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 17 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                  ['BID', '99151'],
                  ['BID', '99153'],
                  ['CVE', '2017-1000364'],
                  ['CVE', '2017-3629'],
                  ['CVE', '2017-3630'],
        Severity: Major
        Found in modules/exploits/solaris/local/rsh_stack_clash_priv_esc.rb and 16 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
        modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_ms17_010.rb on lines 37..46
        modules/exploits/freebsd/local/intel_sysret_priv_esc.rb on lines 52..61
        modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_chocobo_root_priv_esc.rb on lines 59..68
        modules/exploits/linux/local/docker_cgroup_escape.rb on lines 49..58
        modules/exploits/linux/local/network_manager_vpnc_username_priv_esc.rb on lines 45..54
        modules/exploits/linux/local/rds_atomic_free_op_null_pointer_deref_priv_esc.rb on lines 60..69
        modules/exploits/linux/local/ufo_privilege_escalation.rb on lines 57..66
        modules/exploits/multi/fileformat/evince_cbt_cmd_injection.rb on lines 42..51
        modules/exploits/multi/http/joomla_http_header_rce.rb on lines 31..40
        modules/exploits/multi/script/web_delivery.rb on lines 79..88
        modules/exploits/solaris/local/libnspr_nspr_log_file_priv_esc.rb on lines 39..48
        modules/exploits/unix/smtp/exim4_string_format.rb on lines 49..58
        modules/exploits/unix/webapp/open_flash_chart_upload_exec.rb on lines 30..39
        modules/exploits/windows/http/exchange_proxylogon_rce.rb on lines 46..58
        modules/exploits/windows/local/ms_ndproxy.rb on lines 70..79
        modules/exploits/windows/scada/rockwell_factorytalk_rce.rb on lines 32..41

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 31.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status