rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method extract_lnk_info has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def extract_lnk_info(path)
    session.fs.dir.foreach(path) do |file_name|
      if file_name =~ /\.lnk$/ # We have a .lnk file
        offset = 0 # TODO: Look at moving this to smaller scope
        lnk_file = session.fs.file.new(path + file_name, 'rb')
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File dumplinks.rb has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class MetasploitModule < Msf::Post
  include Msf::Post::Windows::Priv
  include Msf::Post::Windows::Accounts

  def initialize(info = {})
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method extract_lnk_info has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def extract_lnk_info(path)
        session.fs.dir.foreach(path) do |file_name|
          if file_name =~ /\.lnk$/ # We have a .lnk file
            offset = 0 # TODO: Look at moving this to smaller scope
            lnk_file = session.fs.file.new(path + file_name, 'rb')
    Severity: Major
    Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method enum_users has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def enum_users
          users = []
          userinfo = {}
          session.sys.config.getuid
          userpath = nil
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method initialize has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def initialize(info = {})
            super(
              update_info(
                info,
                'Name' => 'Windows Gather Dump Recent Files lnk Info',
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
          Open

                        if (loc['flags'] & 0x01) > 0
          
                          @data_out += "\tShortcut file is on a local volume.\n"
          
                          lnk_file.sysseek(offset + loc['vol_ofs'], ::IO::SEEK_SET)
          Severity: Major
          Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 45 mins to fix

            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
            Open

                          if loc['base_ofs'] > 0
                            @data_out += get_target_path(loc['base_ofs'] + offset, lnk_file)
                          elsif loc['path_ofs'] > 0
                            @data_out += get_target_path(loc['path_ofs'] + offset, lnk_file)
                          end
            Severity: Major
            Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 45 mins to fix

              Method enum_users has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def enum_users
                  users = []
                  userinfo = {}
                  session.sys.config.getuid
                  userpath = nil
              Severity: Minor
              Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 45 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
              Open

                            if (loc['flags'] & 0x02) > 0
              
                              @data_out += "\tFile is on a network share.\n"
              
                              lnk_file.sysseek(offset + loc['network_ofs'], ::IO::SEEK_SET)
              Severity: Major
              Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 45 mins to fix

                Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  def run
                    print_status("Running module against #{sysinfo['Computer']}")
                    enum_users.each do |user|
                      if user['userpath']
                        print_status "Extracting lnk files for user #{user['username']} at #{user['userpath']}..."
                Severity: Minor
                Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  def initialize(info = {})
                    super(
                      update_info(
                        info,
                        'Name' => 'Windows Gather Dump Recent Files lnk Info',
                Severity: Minor
                Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb and 2 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
                modules/post/windows/gather/credentials/enum_cred_store.rb on lines 8..37
                modules/post/windows/gather/forensics/browser_history.rb on lines 14..42

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 36.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                      if user['useroffcpath']
                        print_status "Extracting lnk files for user #{user['username']} at #{user['useroffcpath']}..."
                        extract_lnk_info(user['useroffcpath'])
                      else
                        print_status "No Recent Office files found for user #{user['username']}. Nothing to do."
                Severity: Minor
                Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
                modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb on lines 48..52

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 28.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                      if user['userpath']
                        print_status "Extracting lnk files for user #{user['username']} at #{user['userpath']}..."
                        extract_lnk_info(user['userpath'])
                      else
                        print_status "No Recent directory found for user #{user['username']}. Nothing to do."
                Severity: Minor
                Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
                modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb on lines 54..58

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 28.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    fileattr = {
                      0x01 => 'Target is read only',
                      0x02 => 'Target is hidden',
                      0x04 => 'Target is a system file',
                      0x08 => 'Target is a volume label',
                Severity: Minor
                Found in modules/post/windows/gather/dumplinks.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
                modules/auxiliary/scanner/scada/modbus_banner_grabbing.rb on lines 79..92

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 28.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status