Method extract_lnk_info
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_lnk_info(path)
session.fs.dir.foreach(path) do |file_name|
if file_name =~ /\.lnk$/ # We have a .lnk file
offset = 0 # TODO: Look at moving this to smaller scope
lnk_file = session.fs.file.new(path + file_name, 'rb')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File dumplinks.rb
has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Post
include Msf::Post::Windows::Priv
include Msf::Post::Windows::Accounts
def initialize(info = {})
Method extract_lnk_info
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_lnk_info(path)
session.fs.dir.foreach(path) do |file_name|
if file_name =~ /\.lnk$/ # We have a .lnk file
offset = 0 # TODO: Look at moving this to smaller scope
lnk_file = session.fs.file.new(path + file_name, 'rb')
Method enum_users
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enum_users
users = []
userinfo = {}
session.sys.config.getuid
userpath = nil
Method initialize
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(
update_info(
info,
'Name' => 'Windows Gather Dump Recent Files lnk Info',
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (loc['flags'] & 0x01) > 0
@data_out += "\tShortcut file is on a local volume.\n"
lnk_file.sysseek(offset + loc['vol_ofs'], ::IO::SEEK_SET)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if loc['base_ofs'] > 0
@data_out += get_target_path(loc['base_ofs'] + offset, lnk_file)
elsif loc['path_ofs'] > 0
@data_out += get_target_path(loc['path_ofs'] + offset, lnk_file)
end
Method enum_users
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enum_users
users = []
userinfo = {}
session.sys.config.getuid
userpath = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (loc['flags'] & 0x02) > 0
@data_out += "\tFile is on a network share.\n"
lnk_file.sysseek(offset + loc['network_ofs'], ::IO::SEEK_SET)
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
print_status("Running module against #{sysinfo['Computer']}")
enum_users.each do |user|
if user['userpath']
print_status "Extracting lnk files for user #{user['username']} at #{user['userpath']}..."
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(
update_info(
info,
'Name' => 'Windows Gather Dump Recent Files lnk Info',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if user['useroffcpath']
print_status "Extracting lnk files for user #{user['username']} at #{user['useroffcpath']}..."
extract_lnk_info(user['useroffcpath'])
else
print_status "No Recent Office files found for user #{user['username']}. Nothing to do."
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if user['userpath']
print_status "Extracting lnk files for user #{user['username']} at #{user['userpath']}..."
extract_lnk_info(user['userpath'])
else
print_status "No Recent directory found for user #{user['username']}. Nothing to do."
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
fileattr = {
0x01 => 'Target is read only',
0x02 => 'Target is hidden',
0x04 => 'Target is a system file',
0x08 => 'Target is a volume label',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76