File options.rb
has 519 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'optparse'
require_relative 'arguments_env'
require_relative 'arguments_file'
module RuboCop
Class Options
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Options
E_STDIN_NO_PATH = '-s/--stdin requires exactly one path, relative to the ' \
'root of the project. RuboCop will use this path to determine which ' \
'cops are enabled (via eg. Include/Exclude), and so that certain cops ' \
'like Naming/FileName can be checked.'
Method validate_cop_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_cop_list(names)
return unless names
cop_names = Cop::Registry.global.names
departments = Cop::Registry.global.departments.map(&:to_s)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_check_options
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_check_options(opts) # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength
section(opts, 'Basic Options') do # rubocop:disable Metrics/BlockLength
option(opts, '-l', '--lint') do
@options[:only] ||= []
@options[:only] << 'Lint'
Method add_cop_selection_csv_option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_cop_selection_csv_option(option, opts)
option(opts, "--#{option} [COP1,COP2,...]") do |list|
unless list
message = "--#{option} argument should be [COP1,COP2,...]."
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_additional_modes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_additional_modes(opts)
section(opts, 'Additional Modes') do
option(opts, '-L', '--list-target-files')
option(opts, '--show-cops [COP1,COP2,...]') do |list|
@options[:show_cops] = list.nil? ? [] : list.split(',')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"