ruby-concurrency/ref

View on GitHub

Showing 3 of 5 total issues

Method delete has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def delete(key)
      ref = @references.delete(key)
      if ref
        keys_to_id = @references_to_keys_map[ref.referenced_object_id]
        if keys_to_id
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ref/abstract_reference_value_map.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method object has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def object #:nodoc:
      @ref.__getobj__
    rescue => e
      # Jruby implementation uses RefError while MRI uses WeakRef::RefError
      if (defined?(RefError) && e.is_a?(RefError)) || (defined?(::WeakRef::RefError) && e.is_a?(::WeakRef::RefError))
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ref/weak_reference/weak_ref.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method remove_backreference has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def remove_backreference(obj) #:nodoc:
          return unless supports_backreference?(obj)
          backreferences = obj.instance_variable_get(:@__weak_backreferences__) if obj.instance_variable_defined?(:@__weak_backreferences__)
          if backreferences
            backreferences.dup.delete(object_id)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ref/weak_reference/pure_ruby.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language