Showing 80 of 86 total issues
Method validates
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validates(attrs, validations)
doc = AttributesDoc.new @api, self
doc.extract_details validations
coerce_type = infer_coercion(validations)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate!(params)
attrs = SingleAttributeIterator.new(self, @scope, params)
attrs.each do |resource_params, attr_name|
next unless @scope.meets_dependency?(resource_params, params)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method requires
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def requires(*attrs, &block)
orig_attrs = attrs.clone
opts = attrs.extract_options!.clone
opts[:presence] = { value: true, message: opts[:message] }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_message_option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_message_option(attrs)
return nil unless attrs.is_a?(Array)
opts = attrs.last.is_a?(Hash) ? attrs.pop : {}
opts.key?(:message) && !opts[:message].nil? ? opts.delete(:message) : nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method redirect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def redirect(url, permanent: false, body: nil, **_options)
body_message = body
if permanent
status 301
body_message ||= "This resource has been moved permanently to #{url}."
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method push_declared_params
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def push_declared_params(attrs, **opts)
opts = opts.merge(declared_params_scope: self) unless opts.key?(:declared_params_scope)
if lateral?
@parent.push_declared_params(attrs, **opts)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_param!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_param!(attr_name, params)
params[attr_name] = if @default.is_a? Proc
if @default.parameters.empty?
@default.call
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return call_with_allow_headers(env, last_neighbor_route) if !cascade && last_neighbor_route
Method check_values
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_values(param_array, attr_name)
values = @values.is_a?(Proc) && @values.arity.zero? ? @values.call : @values
return true if values.nil?
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mime_array
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mime_array
accept = env[Grape::Http::Headers::HTTP_ACCEPT]
return [] unless accept
accept_into_mime_and_quality = %r{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_headers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_headers
Grape::Util::LazyObject.new do
env.each_pair.with_object({}) do |(k, v), headers|
next unless k.to_s.start_with? HTTP_PREFIX
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method should_validate?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def should_validate?(parameters)
scoped_params = params(parameters)
return false if @optional && (scoped_params.blank? || all_element_blank?(scoped_params))
return false unless meets_dependency?(scoped_params, parameters)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method meets_dependency?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def meets_dependency?(params, request_params)
return true unless @dependent_on
return false if @parent.present? && !@parent.meets_dependency?(@parent.params(request_params), request_params)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stream
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stream(value = nil)
return if value.nil? && @stream.nil?
header Rack::CONTENT_LENGTH, nil
header Grape::Http::Headers::TRANSFER_ENCODING, nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(message, backtrace, options = {}, env = nil, original_exception = nil)
message = present(message, env)
result = message.is_a?(Hash) ? ::Grape::Json.dump(message) : message
rescue_options = options[:rescue_options] || {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compose_message
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compose_message(key, **attributes)
short_message = translate_message(key, **attributes)
if short_message.is_a? Hash
@problem = problem(key, **attributes)
@summary = summary(key, **attributes)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rescue_handler_for_grape_exception
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rescue_handler_for_grape_exception(klass)
return unless klass <= Grape::Exceptions::Base
return method(:error_response) if klass == Grape::Exceptions::InvalidVersionHeader
return unless options[:rescue_grape_exceptions] || !options[:rescue_all]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_param!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_param!(attr_name, params)
raise validation_exception(attr_name) unless params.is_a? Hash
new_value = coerce_value(params[attr_name])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method before
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def before
potential_version = (env[Grape::Http::Headers::HTTP_ACCEPT_VERSION] || '').strip
if strict? && potential_version.empty?
# If no Accept-Version header:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method infer_type_check
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def infer_type_check(type)
# First check for special class methods
if type.respond_to? :coerced?
type.method :coerced?
elsif type.respond_to? :parsed?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"