Class ParamsScope
has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ParamsScope
attr_accessor :element, :parent, :index
attr_reader :type
include Grape::DSL::Parameters
File params_scope.rb
has 322 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require_relative 'attributes_doc'
module Grape
module Validations
class ParamsScope
Method infer_coercion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def infer_coercion(validations)
raise ArgumentError, ':type may not be supplied with :types' if validations.key?(:type) && validations.key?(:types)
validations[:coerce] = (options_key?(:type, :value, validations) ? validations[:type][:value] : validations[:type]) if validations.key?(:type)
validations[:coerce_message] = (options_key?(:type, :message, validations) ? validations[:type][:message] : nil) if validations.key?(:type)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_value_coercion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_value_coercion(coerce_type, *values_list)
return unless coerce_type
coerce_type = coerce_type.first if coerce_type.is_a?(Array)
values_list.each do |values|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new_scope
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new_scope(attrs, optional = false, &block)
# if required params are grouped and no type or unsupported type is provided, raise an error
type = attrs[1] ? attrs[1][:type] : nil
if attrs.first && !optional
raise Grape::Exceptions::MissingGroupType if type.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method meets_hash_dependency?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def meets_hash_dependency?(params)
# params might be anything what looks like a hash, so it must implement a `key?` method
return false unless params.respond_to?(:key?)
@dependent_on.each do |dependency|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_incompatible_option_values
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_incompatible_option_values(default, values, except_values, excepts)
return unless default && !default.is_a?(Proc)
raise Grape::Exceptions::IncompatibleOptionValues.new(:default, default, :values, values) if values && !values.is_a?(Proc) && !Array(default).all? { |def_val| values.include?(def_val) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method guess_coerce_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def guess_coerce_type(coerce_type, *values_list)
return coerce_type unless coerce_type == Array
values_list.each do |values|
next if !values || values.is_a?(Proc)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(type, options, attrs, doc, opts)
Method push_declared_params
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def push_declared_params(attrs, **opts)
opts = opts.merge(declared_params_scope: self) unless opts.key?(:declared_params_scope)
if lateral?
@parent.push_declared_params(attrs, **opts)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validates
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validates(attrs, validations)
doc = AttributesDoc.new @api, self
doc.extract_details validations
coerce_type = infer_coercion(validations)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method require_required_and_optional_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def require_required_and_optional_fields(context, opts)
if context == :all
optional_fields = Array(opts[:except])
required_fields = opts[:using].keys - optional_fields
else # context == :none
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_message_option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_message_option(attrs)
return nil unless attrs.is_a?(Array)
opts = attrs.last.is_a?(Hash) ? attrs.pop : {}
opts.key?(:message) && !opts[:message].nil? ? opts.delete(:message) : nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method meets_dependency?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def meets_dependency?(params, request_params)
return true unless @dependent_on
return false if @parent.present? && !@parent.meets_dependency?(@parent.params(request_params), request_params)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method should_validate?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def should_validate?(parameters)
scoped_params = params(parameters)
return false if @optional && (scoped_params.blank? || all_element_blank?(scoped_params))
return false unless meets_dependency?(scoped_params, parameters)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"