Showing 406 of 406 total issues
Method parse_class_singleton
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_class_singleton container, name, comment # :nodoc:
other = @store.find_class_named name
unless other then
if name =~ /^::/ then
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_class_regular
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_class_regular container, declaration_context, single, # :nodoc:
name_t, given_name, comment
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
parse_comment container, tk, comment unless comment.empty?
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
non_comment_seen = parse_comment container, tk, comment unless
comment.empty?
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
comment << "\n" unless comment_body =~ /\n\z/
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if comment_body.size > 1 && comment_body =~ /\n\z/ then
skip_tkspace_without_nl # leading spaces
end
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if container.done_documenting then
throw :eof if RDoc::TopLevel === container
container.ongoing_visibility = save_visibility
end
Method write_style_sheet
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_style_sheet
debug_msg "Copying static files"
options = { :verbose => $DEBUG_RDOC, :noop => @dry_run }
BUILTIN_STYLE_ITEMS.each do |item|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
line_no = tk[:line_no] if comment.empty?
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
elsif :on_nl == tk[:kind] then
if nest <= 0 and RDoc::Parser::RipperStateLex.end?(tk) then
unget_tk tk
break
end
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
comment = RDoc::Encoding.change_encoding comment, @encoding if @encoding
Method parse_meta_attr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_meta_attr(context, single, tk, comment)
args = parse_symbol_arg
rw = "?"
# If nodoc is given, don't document any of them
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(base, commit, author, email, date, contents)
Method find_class_named_from
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_class_named_from name, from
from = find_class_named from unless RDoc::Context === from
until RDoc::TopLevel === from do
return nil unless from
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_cache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_cache
#orig_enc = @encoding
@cache = marshal_load(cache_path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_method
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_method(type, var_name, meth_name, function, param_count,
source_file = nil)
Method find_methods
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_methods name
klass, selector, method = parse_name name
types = method_type selector
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_directive
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_directive prefix, directive, param, code_object = nil,
encoding = nil, line = nil
Method display_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def display_attributes
puts
puts @str.tr(NULL, "!")
bit = 1
16.times do |bno|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convert_regexp_handlings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_regexp_handlings str, attrs, exclusive = false
@regexp_handlings.each do |regexp, attribute|
next unless exclusive == exclusive?(attribute)
str.scan(regexp) do
capture = $~.size == 1 ? 0 : 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"