File jquery-1.9.1.js
has 6570 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.9.1
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Includes Sizzle.js
Function ajax
has 241 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
Function setDocument
has 230 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setDocument = Sizzle.setDocument = function( node ) {
var doc = node ? node.ownerDocument || node : preferredDoc;
// If no document and documentElement is available, return
if ( doc === document || doc.nodeType !== 9 || !doc.documentElement ) {
Function Callbacks
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( options ) {
// Convert options from String-formatted to Object-formatted if needed
// (we check in cache first)
options = typeof options === "string" ?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && original.clientX != null ) {
eventDoc = event.target.ownerDocument || document;
doc = eventDoc.documentElement;
body = eventDoc.body;
Function support
has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.support = (function() {
var support, all, a,
input, select, fragment,
opt, eventName, isSupported, i,
Function defaultPrefilter
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function defaultPrefilter( elem, props, opts ) {
/*jshint validthis:true */
var prop, index, length,
value, dataShow, toggle,
tween, hooks, oldfire,
Function trigger
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
var handle, ontype, cur,
bubbleType, special, tmp, i,
eventPath = [ elem || document ],
type = core_hasOwn.call( event, "type" ) ? event.type : event,
Function Animation
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Animation( elem, properties, options ) {
var result,
stopped,
index = 0,
length = animationPrefilters.length,
Function send
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
// Get a new xhr
var handle, i,
xhr = s.xhr();
Function Sizzle
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Sizzle( selector, context, results, seed ) {
var match, elem, m, nodeType,
// QSA vars
i, groups, old, nid, newContext, newSelector;
Function buildFragment
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
buildFragment: function( elems, context, scripts, selection ) {
var j, elem, contains,
tmp, tag, tbody, wrap,
l = elems.length,
Function matcherFromGroupMatchers
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherFromGroupMatchers( elementMatchers, setMatchers ) {
// A counter to specify which element is currently being matched
var matcherCachedRuns = 0,
bySet = setMatchers.length > 0,
byElement = elementMatchers.length > 0,
Function add
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
var tmp, events, t, handleObjIn,
special, eventHandle, handleObj,
handlers, type, namespaces, origType,
elemData = jQuery._data( elem );
Function domManip
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domManip: function( args, table, callback ) {
// Flatten any nested arrays
args = core_concat.apply( [], args );
Function done
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done( status, nativeStatusText, responses, headers ) {
var isSuccess, success, error, response, modified,
statusText = nativeStatusText;
// Called once
Function setMatcher
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setMatcher( preFilter, selector, matcher, postFilter, postFinder, postSelector ) {
if ( postFilter && !postFilter[ expando ] ) {
postFilter = setMatcher( postFilter );
}
if ( postFinder && !postFinder[ expando ] ) {
Function superMatcher
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, expandContext ) {
var elem, j, matcher,
setMatched = [],
matchedCount = 0,
i = "0",
Function Deferred
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Deferred: function( func ) {
var tuples = [
// action, add listener, listener list, final state
[ "resolve", "done", jQuery.Callbacks("once memory"), "resolved" ],
[ "reject", "fail", jQuery.Callbacks("once memory"), "rejected" ],
Function CHILD
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, argument, first, last ) {
var simple = type.slice( 0, 3 ) !== "nth",
forward = type.slice( -4 ) !== "last",
ofType = what === "of-type";
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( forward && useCache ) {
// Seek `elem` from a previously-cached index
outerCache = parent[ expando ] || (parent[ expando ] = {});
cache = outerCache[ type ] || [];
nodeIndex = cache[0] === dirruns && cache[1];
Function init
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function( selector, context, rootjQuery ) {
var match, elem;
// HANDLE: $(""), $(null), $(undefined), $(false)
if ( !selector ) {
Function ajaxConvert
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxConvert( s, response ) {
var conv2, current, conv, tmp,
converters = {},
i = 0,
// Work with a copy of dataTypes in case we need to modify it for conversion
Function internalData
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function internalData( elem, name, data, pvt /* Internal Use Only */ ){
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function remove
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {
var j, handleObj, tmp,
origCount, t, events,
special, handlers, type,
namespaces, origType,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( ( mappedTypes || origType === handleObj.origType ) &&
( !handler || handler.guid === handleObj.guid ) &&
( !tmp || tmp.test( handleObj.namespace ) ) &&
( !selector || selector === handleObj.selector || selector === "**" && handleObj.selector ) ) {
handlers.splice( j, 1 );
Function internalRemoveData
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function internalRemoveData( elem, name, pvt ) {
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function tokenize
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function tokenize( selector, parseOnly ) {
var matched, match, tokens, type,
soFar, groups, preFilters,
cached = tokenCache[ selector + " " ];
Function select
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function select( selector, context, results, seed ) {
var i, tokens, token, type, find,
match = tokenize( selector );
if ( !seed ) {
Function ajaxHandleResponses
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxHandleResponses( s, jqXHR, responses ) {
var firstDataType, ct, finalDataType, type,
contents = s.contents,
dataTypes = s.dataTypes,
responseFields = s.responseFields;
Function matcherFromTokens
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherFromTokens( tokens ) {
var checkContext, matcher, j,
len = tokens.length,
leadingRelative = Expr.relative[ tokens[0].type ],
implicitRelative = leadingRelative || Expr.relative[" "],
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( typeof value === "string" && !rnoInnerhtml.test( value ) &&
( jQuery.support.htmlSerialize || !rnoshimcache.test( value ) ) &&
( jQuery.support.leadingWhitespace || !rleadingWhitespace.test( value ) ) &&
!wrapMap[ ( rtagName.exec( value ) || ["", ""] )[1].toLowerCase() ] ) {
Function val
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
val: function( value ) {
var ret, hooks, isFunction,
elem = this[0];
if ( !arguments.length ) {
Function addCombinator
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function addCombinator( matcher, combinator, base ) {
var dir = combinator.dir,
checkNonElements = base && dir === "parentNode",
doneName = done++;
Function extend
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend = jQuery.fn.extend = function() {
var src, copyIsArray, copy, name, options, clone,
target = arguments[0] || {},
i = 1,
length = arguments.length,
Function on
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {
var type, origFn;
// Types can be a map of types/handlers
if ( typeof types === "object" ) {
Function stop
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
stop: function( type, clearQueue, gotoEnd ) {
var stopQueue = function( hooks ) {
var stop = hooks.stop;
delete hooks.stop;
stop( gotoEnd );
Function each
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
each: function( obj, callback, args ) {
var value,
i = 0,
length = obj.length,
isArray = isArraylike( obj );
Function showHide
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function showHide( elements, show ) {
var display, elem, hidden,
values = [],
index = 0,
length = elements.length;
Function when
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
when: function( subordinate /* , ..., subordinateN */ ) {
var i = 0,
resolveValues = core_slice.call( arguments ),
length = resolveValues.length,
Function clone
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clone: function( elem, dataAndEvents, deepDataAndEvents ) {
var destElements, node, clone, i, srcElements,
inPage = jQuery.contains( elem.ownerDocument, elem );
if ( jQuery.support.html5Clone || jQuery.isXMLDoc(elem) || !rnoshimcache.test( "<" + elem.nodeName + ">" ) ) {
Function access
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
access: function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, raw ) {
var i = 0,
length = elems.length,
bulk = key == null;
Function dispatch
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dispatch: function( event ) {
// Make a writable jQuery.Event from the native event object
event = jQuery.event.fix( event );
Function style
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
style: function( elem, name, value, extra ) {
// Don't set styles on text and comment nodes
if ( !elem || elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 || !elem.style ) {
return;
}
Function data
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function( key, value ) {
var attrs, name,
elem = this[0],
i = 0,
data = null;
Function cleanData
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
cleanData: function( elems, /* internal */ acceptData ) {
var elem, type, id, data,
i = 0,
internalKey = jQuery.expando,
cache = jQuery.cache,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if ( useCache && (cache = (elem[ expando ] || (elem[ expando ] = {}))[ type ]) && cache[0] === dirruns ) {
diff = cache[1];
// xml :nth-child(...) or :nth-last-child(...) or :nth(-last)?-of-type(...)
} else {
Function attr
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
attr: function( elem, name, value ) {
var hooks, notxml, ret,
nType = elem.nodeType;
// don't get/set attributes on text, comment and attribute nodes
Function setOffset
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setOffset: function( elem, options, i ) {
var position = jQuery.css( elem, "position" );
// set position first, in-case top/left are set even on static elem
if ( position === "static" ) {
Function load
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.load = function( url, params, callback ) {
if ( typeof url !== "string" && _load ) {
return _load.apply( this, arguments );
}
Function fixCloneNodeIssues
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fixCloneNodeIssues( src, dest ) {
var nodeName, e, data;
// We do not need to do anything for non-Elements
if ( dest.nodeType !== 1 ) {
Function promise
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.ready.promise = function( obj ) {
if ( !readyList ) {
readyList = jQuery.Deferred();
Function handlers
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
handlers: function( event, handlers ) {
var sel, handleObj, matches, i,
handlerQueue = [],
delegateCount = handlers.delegateCount,
cur = event.target;
Function removeClass
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
removeClass: function( value ) {
var classes, elem, cur, clazz, j,
i = 0,
len = this.length,
proceed = arguments.length === 0 || typeof value === "string" && value;
Function html
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
html: function( value ) {
return jQuery.access( this, function( value ) {
var elem = this[0] || {},
i = 0,
l = this.length;
Function addClass
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addClass: function( value ) {
var classes, elem, cur, clazz, j,
i = 0,
len = this.length,
proceed = typeof value === "string" && value;
Function finish
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
finish: function( type ) {
if ( type !== false ) {
type = type || "fx";
}
return this.each(function() {
Function fix
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fix: function( event ) {
if ( event[ jQuery.expando ] ) {
return event;
}
Function setup
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup: function() {
if ( rformElems.test( this.nodeName ) ) {
// IE doesn't fire change on a check/radio until blur; trigger it on click
// after a propertychange. Eat the blur-change in special.change.handle.
Function propFilter
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function propFilter( props, specialEasing ) {
var value, name, index, easing, hooks;
// camelCase, specialEasing and expand cssHook pass
for ( index in props ) {
Function offset
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.offset = function( options ) {
if ( arguments.length ) {
return options === undefined ?
this :
this.each(function( i ) {
Function off
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
off: function( types, selector, fn ) {
var handleObj, type;
if ( types && types.preventDefault && types.handleObj ) {
// ( event ) dispatched jQuery.Event
handleObj = types.handleObj;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( unit !== "px" && start ) {
// Iteratively approximate from a nonzero starting point
// Prefer the current property, because this process will be trivial if it uses the same units
// Fallback to end or a simple constant
start = jQuery.css( tween.elem, prop, true ) || end || 1;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( jQuery.expr && jQuery.expr.filters ) {
jQuery.expr.filters.hidden = function( elem ) {
// Support: Opera <= 12.12
// Opera reports offsetWidths and offsetHeights less than zero on some elements
return elem.offsetWidth <= 0 && elem.offsetHeight <= 0 ||
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ( copy !== undefined ) {
target[ name ] = copy;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( hasScripts ) {
jQuery.merge( scripts, getAll( node, "script" ) );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( rscriptType.test( node.type || "" ) &&
!jQuery._data( node, "globalEval" ) && jQuery.contains( doc, node ) ) {
if ( node.src ) {
// Hope ajax is available...
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( typeof xhr.responseText === "string" ) {
responses.text = xhr.responseText;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( name in thisCache ) {
name = [ name ];
} else {
name = name.split(" ");
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( (elem = matcherOut[i]) ) {
// Restore matcherIn since elem is not yet a final match
temp.push( (matcherIn[i] = elem) );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( matches[ sel ] === undefined ) {
matches[ sel ] = handleObj.needsContext ?
jQuery( sel, this ).index( cur ) >= 0 :
jQuery.find( sel, this, null, [ cur ] ).length;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( type in data.events ) {
if ( special[ type ] ) {
jQuery.event.remove( elem, type );
// This is a shortcut to avoid jQuery.event.remove's overhead
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( elem && elem.parentNode ) {
// Handle the case where IE, Opera, and Webkit return items
// by name instead of ID
if ( elem.id === m ) {
results.push( elem );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( xhrOnUnloadAbort ) {
delete xhrCallbacks[ handle ];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( conv && s["throws"] ) {
response = conv( response );
} else {
try {
response = conv( response );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( xhr.readyState !== 4 ) {
xhr.abort();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( match in context ) {
// Properties of context are called as methods if possible
if ( jQuery.isFunction( this[ match ] ) ) {
this[ match ]( context[ match ] );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( copyIsArray ) {
copyIsArray = false;
clone = src && jQuery.isArray(src) ? src : [];
} else {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( (event.result = ret) === false ) {
event.preventDefault();
event.stopPropagation();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( context.ownerDocument && (elem = context.ownerDocument.getElementById( m )) &&
contains( context, elem ) && elem.id === m ) {
results.push( elem );
return results;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !status && s.isLocal && !s.crossDomain ) {
status = responses.text ? 200 : 404;
// IE - #1450: sometimes returns 1223 when it should be 204
} else if ( status === 1223 ) {
status = 204;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( elem.id !== match[2] ) {
return rootjQuery.find( selector );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !name.indexOf( "data-" ) ) {
name = jQuery.camelCase( name.slice(5) );
dataAttr( elem, name, data[ name ] );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( cache[1] === true ) {
return true;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ( ofType ? node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name : node.nodeType === 1 ) && ++diff ) {
// Cache the index of each encountered element
if ( useCache ) {
(node[ expando ] || (node[ expando ] = {}))[ type ] = [ dirruns, diff ];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !(unmatched[i] || setMatched[i]) ) {
setMatched[i] = pop.call( results );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while ( cur.indexOf( " " + clazz + " " ) >= 0 ) {
cur = cur.replace( " " + clazz + " ", " " );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( (data = cache[1]) === true || data === cachedruns ) {
return data === true;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( (seed = find(
token.matches[0].replace( runescape, funescape ),
rsibling.test( tokens[0].type ) && context.parentNode || context
)) ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( cur.indexOf( " " + clazz + " " ) < 0 ) {
cur += clazz + " ";
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !xhrCallbacks ) {
xhrCallbacks = {};
jQuery( window ).unload( xhrOnUnloadAbort );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( conv2 in converters ) {
// If conv2 outputs current
tmp = conv2.split(" ");
if ( tmp[ 1 ] === current ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( matches[ sel ] ) {
matches.push( handleObj );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( deleteExpando ) {
delete elem[ internalKey ];
} else if ( typeof elem.removeAttribute !== core_strundefined ) {
elem.removeAttribute( internalKey );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ofType ? node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name : node.nodeType === 1 ) {
return false;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while ( j-- ) {
if ( jQuery.nodeName( (tbody = elem.childNodes[j]), "tbody" ) && !tbody.childNodes.length ) {
elem.removeChild( tbody );
}
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( s.crossDomain == null ) {
parts = rurl.exec( s.url.toLowerCase() );
s.crossDomain = !!( parts &&
( parts[ 1 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 1 ] || parts[ 2 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 2 ] ||
( parts[ 3 ] || ( parts[ 1 ] === "http:" ? 80 : 443 ) ) !=
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( (!id || !cache[id] || (!pvt && !cache[id].data)) && getByName && data === undefined ) {
return;
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( !jQuery.support.opacity ) {
jQuery.cssHooks.opacity = {
get: function( elem, computed ) {
// IE uses filters for opacity
return ropacity.test( (computed && elem.currentStyle ? elem.currentStyle.filter : elem.style.filter) || "" ) ?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( matcher[ expando ] ) {
// Find the next relative operator (if any) for proper handling
j = ++i;
for ( ; j < len; j++ ) {
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret == null ?
undefined :
ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return rootjQuery.ready( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return elem[ name ];
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ( context || rootjQuery ).find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return a.compareDocumentPosition ? -1 : 1;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return results;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return compare & 4 ? -1 : 1;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return select( selector.replace( rtrim, "$1" ), context, results, seed );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return jQuery.makeArray( selector, this );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.constructor( context ).find( selector );
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageY = original.clientY + ( doc && doc.scrollTop || body && body.scrollTop || 0 ) - ( doc && doc.clientTop || body && body.clientTop || 0 );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageX = original.clientX + ( doc && doc.scrollLeft || body && body.scrollLeft || 0 ) - ( doc && doc.clientLeft || body && body.clientLeft || 0 );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).addClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).removeClass( value.call( this, j, this.className ) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapAll( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapInner( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"even": createPositionalPseudo(function( matchIndexes, length ) {
var i = 0;
for ( ; i < length; i += 2 ) {
matchIndexes.push( i );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"odd": createPositionalPseudo(function( matchIndexes, length ) {
var i = 1;
for ( ; i < length; i += 2 ) {
matchIndexes.push( i );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
cur = elem.nodeType === 1 && ( elem.className ?
( " " + elem.className + " " ).replace( rclass, " " ) :
" "
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
cur = elem.nodeType === 1 && ( elem.className ?
( " " + elem.className + " " ).replace( rclass, " " ) :
""
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( extra !== "margin" ) {
val -= jQuery.css( elem, "border" + cssExpand[ i ] + "Width", true, styles );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 43.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( extra !== "padding" ) {
val += jQuery.css( elem, "border" + cssExpand[ i ] + "Width", true, styles );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 43.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( ; i < length; i++ ) {
value = callback( elems[ i ], i, arg );
if ( value != null ) {
ret[ ret.length ] = value;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( i in elems ) {
value = callback( elems[ i ], i, arg );
if ( value != null ) {
ret[ ret.length ] = value;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( options.left != null ) {
props.left = ( options.left - curOffset.left ) + curLeft;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( options.top != null ) {
props.top = ( options.top - curOffset.top ) + curTop;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76