Showing 11 of 11 total issues
Method iterate_with_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def iterate_with_xml(hash)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new
attributes = hash[:attributes!] || {}
hash_without_attributes = hash.except(:attributes!)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.build_xml(array, key, escape_xml = true, attributes = {}, options = {})
self_closing = options.delete(:self_closing)
unwrap = unwrap?(options.fetch(:unwrap, false), key)
iterate_with_xml array, key, attributes, options do |xml, item, attrs, index|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(object, escape_xml = true, options = {})
case object
when Time
object.strftime XS_TIME_FORMAT
when DateTime
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_xml(hash, options = {})
iterate_with_xml hash do |xml, key, value, attributes|
self_closing = key.to_s[-1, 1] == "/"
escape_xml = key.to_s[-1, 1] != "!"
xml_key = XMLKey.create key, options
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_xml
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xml(array, key, escape_xml = true, attributes = {}, options = {})
Method build_xml
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.build_xml(array, key, escape_xml = true, attributes = {}, options = {})
Method iterate_with_xml
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def iterate_with_xml(array, key, attributes, options, &block)
Method iterate_array
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def iterate_array(xml, array, attributes, &block)
array.each_with_index do |item, index|
attrs = if item.respond_to?(:keys)
item.each_with_object({}) do |v, st|
k = v[0].to_s
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method key_converter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def key_converter(options, xml_key)
return options[:key_converter] if options[:key_converter].is_a? Proc
defined_key = options[:key_to_convert]
key_converter = if !defined_key.nil? && (defined_key == xml_key)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method order
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def order(hash)
order = hash[:order!] || hash.delete("order!")
hash_without_order = hash.except(:order!)
order = hash_without_order.keys unless order.is_a? ::Array
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tag_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tag_attributes(attributes, index)
return {} if attributes.empty?
attributes.inject({}) do |hash, (key, value)|
value = value[index] if value.is_a? ::Array
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"