sparklemotion/nokogiri

View on GitHub
ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java

Summary

Maintainability
B
5 hrs
Test Coverage

XmlSaxParserContext has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

@JRubyClass(name = "Nokogiri::XML::SAX::ParserContext")
public class XmlSaxParserContext extends ParserContext
{
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

Severity: Minor
Found in ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method parse_with has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      @JRubyMethod
      public IRubyObject
      parse_with(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject handlerRuby)
      {
        final Ruby runtime = context.getRuntime();
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java - About 1 hr to fix

      Method parse_with has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        @JRubyMethod
        public IRubyObject
        parse_with(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject handlerRuby)
        {
          final Ruby runtime = context.getRuntime();
      Severity: Minor
      Found in ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        @JRubyMethod(name = "column")
        public IRubyObject
        column(ThreadContext context)
        {
          final Integer number = handler.getColumn();
      Severity: Minor
      Found in ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
      ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java on lines 321..328

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 46.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        @JRubyMethod(name = "line")
        public IRubyObject
        line(ThreadContext context)
        {
          final Integer number = handler.getLine();
      Severity: Minor
      Found in ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
      ext/java/nokogiri/XmlSaxParserContext.java on lines 312..319

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 46.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status