Sign upLogin

thoughtbot/capybara-webkit

View on GitHub
Star
lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
7 hrs
Test Coverage

Class Node has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class Node < Capybara::Driver::Node
    def initialize(driver, base, browser)
      super(driver, base)
      @browser = browser
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    Method convert_to_named_keys has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def convert_to_named_keys(key)
      if key.is_a? Array
        key.map { |k| convert_to_named_keys(k)}
      else
        case key
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method [] has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def [](name)
      name = name.to_s
      tn = tag_name
      if (tn == "img" && name == "src") || (tn == "a" && name == "href")
        # Although the attribute matters, the property is consistent. Return that in
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

            if Capybara::VERSION.to_f < 3.0
        Capybara::Helpers.normalize_whitespace(text)
      else
        text.gsub(/\ +/, ' ')
            .gsub(/[\ \n]*\n[\ \n]*/, "\n")
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
      lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb on lines 24..31

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 26.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

            if Capybara::VERSION.to_f < 3.0
        Capybara::Helpers.normalize_whitespace(text)
      else
        text.gsub(/[\u200b\u200e\u200f]/, '')
            .gsub(/[\ \n\f\t\v\u2028\u2029]+/, ' ')
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
      lib/capybara/webkit/node.rb on lines 10..17

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 26.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status