Sign upLogin

thoughtbot/paperclip

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,006 of 1,009 total issues

Method flush_writes has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def flush_writes #:nodoc:
        @queued_for_write.each do |style, file|
        retries = 0
          begin
            log("saving #{path(style)}")
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/paperclip/storage/s3.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method flush_deletes has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def flush_deletes #:nodoc:
        @queued_for_delete.each do |path|
          begin
            log("deleting #{path}")
            FileUtils.rm(path) if File.exist?(path)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/paperclip/storage/filesystem.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method missing_attachments_styles has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def self.missing_attachments_styles
    current_styles = current_attachments_styles
    registered_styles = get_registered_attachments_styles

    Hash.new.tap do |missing_styles|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/paperclip/missing_attachment_styles.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method post_process_style has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def post_process_style(name, style) #:nodoc:
      begin
        raise RuntimeError.new("Style #{name} has no processors defined.") if style.processors.blank?
        intermediate_files = []
        original = @queued_for_write[:original]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/paperclip/attachment.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method extended has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def self.extended base
        begin
          require 'fog'
        rescue LoadError => e
          e.message << " (You may need to install the fog gem)"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/paperclip/storage/fog.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method flush_writes has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def flush_writes #:nodoc:
        @queued_for_write.each do |style_name, file|
          FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.dirname(path(style_name)))
          begin
            move_file(file.path, path(style_name))
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/paperclip/storage/filesystem.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Block has too many lines. [34/25]
    Open

            @queued_for_write.each do |style, file|
        retries = 0
          begin
            log("saving #{path(style)}")
            write_options = {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/paperclip/storage/s3.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.

    Method make has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def make
      src = @file
      filename = [@basename, @format ? ".#{@format}" : ""].join
      dst = TempfileFactory.new.generate(filename)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/paperclip/thumbnail.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method default_options has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def self.default_options
      @default_options ||= {
        :convert_options       => {},
        :default_style         => :original,
        :default_url           => "/:attachment/:style/missing.png",
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/paperclip/attachment.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method validates_attachment has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def validates_attachment(*attributes)
        options = attributes.extract_options!.dup

        Paperclip::Validators.constants.each do |constant|
          if constant.to_s =~ /\AAttachment(.+)Validator\z/
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/validators.rb - About 55 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method resize_to has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def resize_to(geometry)
      new_geometry = Paperclip::Geometry.parse geometry
      case new_geometry.modifier
      when '!', '#'
        new_geometry
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/geometry.rb - About 55 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method flush_writes has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def flush_writes
        for style, file in @queued_for_write do
          log("saving #{path(style)}")
          retried = false
          begin
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/storage/fog.rb - About 55 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                  klass_sym = klass.to_s.to_sym
          current_styles[klass_sym] ||= Hash.new
          current_styles[klass_sym][attachment_name.to_sym] ||= Array.new
          current_styles[klass_sym][attachment_name.to_sym] << style_name.to_sym
          current_styles[klass_sym][attachment_name.to_sym].map!(&:to_s).sort!.map!(&:to_sym).uniq!
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/missing_attachment_styles.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
        lib/paperclip/missing_attachment_styles.rb on lines 69..73

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 43.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    klass_sym = klass.to_s.to_sym
            missing_styles[klass_sym] ||= Hash.new
            missing_styles[klass_sym][attachment_name.to_sym] ||= Array.new
            missing_styles[klass_sym][attachment_name.to_sym].concat(missed.to_a)
            missing_styles[klass_sym][attachment_name.to_sym].map!(&:to_s).sort!.map!(&:to_sym).uniq!
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/missing_attachment_styles.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
        lib/paperclip/missing_attachment_styles.rb on lines 41..45

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 43.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Method load_processor has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def load_processor(name)
      if defined?(Rails.root) && Rails.root
        filename = "#{name.to_s.underscore}.rb"
        directories = %w(lib/paperclip lib/paperclip_processors)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/processor_helpers.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method queue_all_for_delete has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def queue_all_for_delete #:nodoc:
      return if !file?
      unless @options[:preserve_files]
        @queued_for_delete += [:original, *styles.keys].uniq.map do |style|
          path(style) if exists?(style)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/attachment.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method content_type_extension has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def content_type_extension attachment, style_name
      mime_type = MIME::Types[attachment.content_type]
      extensions_for_mime_type = unless mime_type.empty?
        mime_type.first.extensions
      else
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/interpolations.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method make has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def make
      src = @file
      filename = [@basename, @format ? ".#{@format}" : ""].join
      dst = TempfileFactory.new.generate(filename)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/thumbnail.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method fog_public has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def fog_public(style = default_style)
        if @options.key?(:fog_public)
          value = @options[:fog_public]
          if value.respond_to?(:key?) && value.key?(style)
            value[style]
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/storage/fog.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method unlink_files has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def unlink_files(files)
      Array(files).each do |file|
        file.close unless file.closed?

        begin
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/paperclip/attachment.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language