File ZendeskInputPlugin.java
has 515 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package org.embulk.input.zendesk;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.ArrayNode;
Method addAllColumnsToSchema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private JsonNode addAllColumnsToSchema(final JsonNode jsonNode, final Target target, final List<String> includes)
{
ConfigDiff configDiff = guessData(jsonNode, target.getJsonName());
ConfigDiff parser = configDiff.getNested("parser");
if (parser.has("columns")) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
ZendeskInputPlugin
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class ZendeskInputPlugin
implements InputPlugin
{
public interface PluginTask
extends Task
PluginTask
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public interface PluginTask
extends Task
{
@Config("login_url")
String getLoginUrl();
Method addAllColumnsToSchema
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private JsonNode addAllColumnsToSchema(final JsonNode jsonNode, final Target target, final List<String> includes)
{
ConfigDiff configDiff = guessData(jsonNode, target.getJsonName());
ConfigDiff parser = configDiff.getNested("parser");
if (parser.has("columns")) {
Method buildConfigDiff
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private ConfigDiff buildConfigDiff(final PluginTask task, final List<TaskReport> taskReports)
{
final ConfigDiff configDiff = CONFIG_MAPPER_FACTORY.newConfigDiff();
if (!taskReports.isEmpty() && task.getIncremental()) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createSampleData
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private List<List<Object>> createSampleData(JsonNode jsonNode, String targetJsonName, List<String> unifiedFieldNames)
{
final List<List<Object>> samples = new ArrayList<>();
Iterator<JsonNode> records = ZendeskUtils.getListRecords(jsonNode, targetJsonName);
while (records.hasNext()) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validateCredentials
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void validateCredentials(PluginTask task)
{
switch (task.getAuthenticationMethod()) {
case OAUTH:
if (!task.getAccessToken().isPresent()) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (type.equals(Types.TIMESTAMP.getName())) {
entry.remove("format");
}
Method validateIncremental
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void validateIncremental(PluginTask task)
{
if (task.getIncremental() && getZendeskService(task).isSupportIncremental()) {
if (!task.getDedup()) {
logger.warn("You've selected to skip de-duplicating records, result may contain duplicated data");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public TaskReport run(final TaskSource taskSource, final Schema schema, final int taskIndex, final PageOutput output)
{
final PluginTask task = TASK_MAPPER.map(taskSource, PluginTask.class);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method unifiedFieldNames
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private List<String> unifiedFieldNames(JsonNode jsonNode, String targetJsonName)
{
List<String> columnNames = new ArrayList<>();
Iterator<JsonNode> records = ZendeskUtils.getListRecords(jsonNode, targetJsonName);
while (records.hasNext()) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (taskReport.has(ZendeskConstants.Field.START_TIME)) {
final Long startTime = taskReport.get(Long.class, ZendeskConstants.Field.START_TIME);
if (startTime != null) {
final OffsetDateTime offsetDateTime = OffsetDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochSecond(startTime), ZoneOffset.UTC);
configDiff.set(ZendeskConstants.Field.START_TIME,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (taskReport.has(ZendeskConstants.Field.END_TIME)) {
final Long endTime = taskReport.get(Long.class, ZendeskConstants.Field.END_TIME);
if (endTime != null) {
final OffsetDateTime offsetDateTime = OffsetDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochSecond(endTime), ZoneOffset.UTC);
configDiff.set(ZendeskConstants.Field.END_TIME,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case BASIC:
if (!task.getUsername().isPresent() || !task.getPassword().isPresent()) {
throw new ConfigException(String.format("username and password are required for authentication method '%s'",
task.getAuthenticationMethod().name().toLowerCase()));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case TOKEN:
if (!task.getUsername().isPresent() || !task.getToken().isPresent()) {
throw new ConfigException(String.format("username and token are required for authentication method '%s'",
task.getAuthenticationMethod().name().toLowerCase()));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76