treasure-data/embulk-input-zendesk

View on GitHub
src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

File ZendeskInputPlugin.java has 515 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package org.embulk.input.zendesk;

import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.ArrayNode;
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 1 day to fix

    Method addAllColumnsToSchema has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        private JsonNode addAllColumnsToSchema(final JsonNode jsonNode, final Target target, final List<String> includes)
        {
            ConfigDiff configDiff = guessData(jsonNode, target.getJsonName());
            ConfigDiff parser = configDiff.getNested("parser");
            if (parser.has("columns")) {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 4 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    ZendeskInputPlugin has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    public class ZendeskInputPlugin
        implements InputPlugin
    {
        public interface PluginTask
            extends Task
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 3 hrs to fix

      PluginTask has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public interface PluginTask
              extends Task
          {
              @Config("login_url")
              String getLoginUrl();
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 2 hrs to fix

        Method addAllColumnsToSchema has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            private JsonNode addAllColumnsToSchema(final JsonNode jsonNode, final Target target, final List<String> includes)
            {
                ConfigDiff configDiff = guessData(jsonNode, target.getJsonName());
                ConfigDiff parser = configDiff.getNested("parser");
                if (parser.has("columns")) {
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 1 hr to fix

          Method buildConfigDiff has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              private ConfigDiff buildConfigDiff(final PluginTask task, final List<TaskReport> taskReports)
              {
                  final ConfigDiff configDiff = CONFIG_MAPPER_FACTORY.newConfigDiff();
          
                  if (!taskReports.isEmpty() && task.getIncremental()) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method createSampleData has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              private List<List<Object>> createSampleData(JsonNode jsonNode, String targetJsonName, List<String> unifiedFieldNames)
              {
                  final List<List<Object>> samples = new ArrayList<>();
                  Iterator<JsonNode> records = ZendeskUtils.getListRecords(jsonNode, targetJsonName);
                  while (records.hasNext()) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method validateCredentials has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              private void validateCredentials(PluginTask task)
              {
                  switch (task.getAuthenticationMethod()) {
                      case OAUTH:
                          if (!task.getAccessToken().isPresent()) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 55 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
          Open

                                  if (type.equals(Types.TIMESTAMP.getName())) {
                                      entry.remove("format");
                                  }
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 45 mins to fix

            Method validateIncremental has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                private void validateIncremental(PluginTask task)
                {
                    if (task.getIncremental() && getZendeskService(task).isSupportIncremental()) {
                        if (!task.getDedup()) {
                            logger.warn("You've selected to skip de-duplicating records, result may contain duplicated data");
            Severity: Minor
            Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 35 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                @Override
                public TaskReport run(final TaskSource taskSource, final Schema schema, final int taskIndex, final PageOutput output)
                {
                    final PluginTask task = TASK_MAPPER.map(taskSource, PluginTask.class);
            
            
            Severity: Minor
            Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method unifiedFieldNames has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                private List<String> unifiedFieldNames(JsonNode jsonNode, String targetJsonName)
                {
                    List<String> columnNames = new ArrayList<>();
                    Iterator<JsonNode> records = ZendeskUtils.getListRecords(jsonNode, targetJsonName);
                    while (records.hasNext()) {
            Severity: Minor
            Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if (taskReport.has(ZendeskConstants.Field.START_TIME)) {
                            final Long startTime = taskReport.get(Long.class, ZendeskConstants.Field.START_TIME);
                            if (startTime != null) {
                                final OffsetDateTime offsetDateTime = OffsetDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochSecond(startTime), ZoneOffset.UTC);
                                configDiff.set(ZendeskConstants.Field.START_TIME,
            src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java on lines 278..285

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 88.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if (taskReport.has(ZendeskConstants.Field.END_TIME)) {
                            final Long endTime = taskReport.get(Long.class, ZendeskConstants.Field.END_TIME);
                            if (endTime != null) {
                                final OffsetDateTime offsetDateTime = OffsetDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochSecond(endTime), ZoneOffset.UTC);
                                configDiff.set(ZendeskConstants.Field.END_TIME,
            src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java on lines 269..276

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 88.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        case BASIC:
                            if (!task.getUsername().isPresent() || !task.getPassword().isPresent()) {
                                throw new ConfigException(String.format("username and password are required for authentication method '%s'",
                                    task.getAuthenticationMethod().name().toLowerCase()));
                            }
            Severity: Minor
            Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
            src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java on lines 508..513

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 46.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        case TOKEN:
                            if (!task.getUsername().isPresent() || !task.getToken().isPresent()) {
                                throw new ConfigException(String.format("username and token are required for authentication method '%s'",
                                    task.getAuthenticationMethod().name().toLowerCase()));
                            }
            Severity: Minor
            Found in src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
            src/main/java/org/embulk/input/zendesk/ZendeskInputPlugin.java on lines 514..519

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 46.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status