Showing 209 of 209 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class NumberFormatsImporter < Importer
requirement :cldr, Versions.cldr_version
output_path 'locales'
locales TwitterCldr.supported_locales
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 112.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method advance_past_suffix
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def advance_past_suffix(cursor, end_pos, state)
suffix_length = 0
if cursor.position < end_pos && state.word_length > 0
uc = cursor.codepoint
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method append_primary_bytes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def append_primary_bytes
@last_leading_byte = nil
@collation_elements.each do |collation_element|
bytes = integer_to_bytes_array(level_weight(collation_element, PRIMARY_LEVEL))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process(str, rule_set)
# markers depend on what rule set we are using
buf = str.unpack("U*")
name = rule_set.name
Method divide_up_dictionary_range
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def divide_up_dictionary_range(cursor, end_pos)
return to_enum(__method__, cursor, end_pos) unless block_given?
return if (end_pos - cursor.position) < min_word_span
state = EngineState.new(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_rule_index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_rule_index(rules)
TwitterCldr::Utils::Trie.new.tap do |trie|
rules.each_with_index do |rule, idx|
next unless rule.forward?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method should_break?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def should_break?(cursor)
idx = cursor.position
# consider case when a space follows the '.' (so we handle i.e. "Mr. Brown")
idx -= 2 if cursor.codepoint(idx - 1) == 32
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method swapCJK
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def swapCJK(code_point)
if code_point >= CJK_BASE
return code_point - CJK_BASE if code_point < CJK_LIMIT
return code_point + NON_CJK_OFFSET if code_point < CJK_COMPAT_USED_BASE
return code_point - CJK_COMPAT_USED_BASE + (CJK_LIMIT - CJK_BASE) if code_point < CJK_COMPAT_USED_LIMIT
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class DateTimeFormatter
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class DateTimeFormatter < Formatter
WEEKDAY_KEYS = [:sun, :mon, :tue, :wed, :thu, :fri, :sat].freeze
METHODS = { # ignoring u, l, g, j, A
Method patterns_from
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def patterns_from(format_node)
format_node.xpath('pattern').each_with_object({}) do |pattern_node, pattern_result|
# CLDR v42 added a few new alt patterns, alphaNextToNumber and noCurrency.
# See: https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-42#h.ocxunccgtf28
next if pattern_node.attribute('alt')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fractional_rule_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fractional_rule_for(number)
# the obvious way to do this (multiply the value being formatted
# by each rule's base value until you get an integral result)
# doesn't work because of rounding error. This method is more
# accurate
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method format_offset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format_offset(offset, is_basic, use_utc_indicator, is_short, ignore_seconds)
abs_offset = offset.abs
return UTC if use_utc_indicator && abs_offset == 0
min_fields_idx = is_short ? 0 : 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compute_explicit_levels
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compute_explicit_levels
current_embedding = @base_embedding
# The directional override is a Character directionality
# constant. -1 means there is no override.
Method handle_next
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_next(cursor)
result = initial_position = cursor.position
state = START_STATE
row = state * (metadata.category_count + NEXT_STATES)
category = 3
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_tailorings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_tailorings(data, locale)
rules = data && data.at_xpath('rules')
return '' unless rules
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method divide_up_dictionary_range
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def divide_up_dictionary_range(cursor, end_pos, &block)
return to_enum(__method__, cursor, end_pos) unless block_given?
input_length = end_pos - cursor.position
best_snlp = Array.new(input_length + 1) { LARGE_NUMBER }
Method resolve_weak_types
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resolve_weak_types
run_count = @runs.size
previous_level = @base_embedding
run_count.times do |run_idx|
Class Loader
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Loader
class << self
def load_yaml(yaml, permitted_classes: [])
if Psych::VERSION >= '4'
Class TransformId
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TransformId
CHAIN = [
:normal_fallback1, :normal_fallback2, :laddered_fallback1,
:normal_fallback3, :laddered_fallback2
]
Method reorder_visually!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reorder_visually!
raise "No string given!" unless @string_arr
# Do this explicitly so we can also find the maximum depth at the
# same time.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"