Showing 571 of 571 total issues
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return undefined;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return {
key: `[${index}]`,
value: input[index],
message: result,
};
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return console.log(
generateCommandDocumentation(
context.extensionConfig.settings,
context.meta.settings,
commandData.commands,
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return execute(command.command, {
context: command.__context,
args: input.extraArguments,
cwd: dirPath,
}).catch((error) => {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return commandResult
.catch((error) => {
log.small.warn('A problem occurred when running the command', error);
});
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return (input) => input;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return github(template, version);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return {
key: `.${key}`,
value: input[key],
message: result,
};
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return download(template, version, clone);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const tree = projectExtensions.map(({ name, version }) => ({
label: `${name}@${version}`,
nodes: getParents(name),
}));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
usedExtensions
.find(({ name }) => name === extensionName)
.parents
.map(({ name, version }) => ({
label: `${name}@${version}`,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function getConfig
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function getConfig(customState) {
if (customState) {
return customState;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function fetchTemplate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function fetchTemplate(template, directory, version, { clone }) {
// The provided template is a local folder
if (folderExists(template, directory)) {
return getAbsolutePath(template, directory);
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createInfoObject
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function createInfoObject({
validator = () => ({ type: '' }),
wrapper,
required = false,
canBeEmpty,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dependenciesToMarkdown
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function dependenciesToMarkdown(name, extension, dependencies = {}) {
const rows = [];
rows.push(`# Dependencies for \`${name}\``, '');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extensionsToMarkdown
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function extensionsToMarkdown(name, usedExtensions = [], commandObject, extension) {
const rows = [];
const packages = usedExtensions.filter((extn) => extn.type === 'package' &&
// Do no list the package itself, this is based on the name of the extension and the current name of the
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function buildGroup
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function buildGroup(cli, command, commandData, allSettingGroups, printGroup, parents, level) {
const rows = [];
rows.push(`##${'#'.repeat(level)} ${command}`);
if (commandData.__meta && commandData.__meta.name) {
rows.push(`__${commandData.__meta.name}__`);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function commandsToMarkdown
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function commandsToMarkdown(
name,
config = {},
commands,
settingsLink,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validateRequiredVersion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function validateRequiredVersion(templateDir) {
// This will eventually be defined by the roc-plugin-create
const createVersion = '1.0.0';
const checkVersion = (file) => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Unexpected trailing comma. Open
...extOptions,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
require or disallow trailing commas (comma-dangle)
Trailing commas in object literals are valid according to the ECMAScript 5 (and ECMAScript 3!) spec. However, IE8 (when not in IE8 document mode) and below will throw an error when it encounters trailing commas in JavaScript.
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
Trailing commas simplify adding and removing items to objects and arrays, since only the lines you are modifying must be touched. Another argument in favor of trailing commas is that it improves the clarity of diffs when an item is added or removed from an object or array:
Less clear:
var foo = {
- bar: "baz",
- qux: "quux"
+ bar: "baz"
};
More clear:
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
- qux: "quux",
};
Rule Details
This rule enforces consistent use of trailing commas in object and array literals.
Options
This rule has a string option or an object option:
{
"comma-dangle": ["error", "never"],
// or
"comma-dangle": ["error", {
"arrays": "never",
"objects": "never",
"imports": "never",
"exports": "never",
"functions": "ignore",
}]
}
-
"never"
(default) disallows trailing commas -
"always"
requires trailing commas -
"always-multiline"
requires trailing commas when the last element or property is in a different line than the closing]
or}
and disallows trailing commas when the last element or property is on the same line as the closing]
or}
-
"only-multiline"
allows (but does not require) trailing commas when the last element or property is in a different line than the closing]
or}
and disallows trailing commas when the last element or property is on the same line as the closing]
or}
Trailing commas in function declarations and function calls are valid syntax since ECMAScript 2017; however, the string option does not check these situations for backwards compatibility.
You can also use an object option to configure this rule for each type of syntax.
Each of the following options can be set to "never"
, "always"
, "always-multiline"
, "only-multiline"
, or "ignore"
.
The default for each option is "never"
unless otherwise specified.
-
arrays
is for array literals and array patterns of destructuring. (e.g.let [a,] = [1,];
) -
objects
is for object literals and object patterns of destructuring. (e.g.let {a,} = {a: 1};
) -
imports
is for import declarations of ES Modules. (e.g.import {a,} from "foo";
) -
exports
is for export declarations of ES Modules. (e.g.export {a,};
) -
functions
is for function declarations and function calls. (e.g.(function(a,){ })(b,);
)
functions
is set to"ignore"
by default for consistency with the string option.
never
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default "never"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "never"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var arr = [1,2,];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default "never"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "never"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var arr = [1,2];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
always
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var arr = [1,2];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var arr = [1,2,];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
always-multiline
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "always-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always-multiline"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var foo = { bar: "baz", qux: "quux", };
var arr = [1,2,];
var arr = [1,
2,];
var arr = [
1,
2
];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "always-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "always-multiline"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var foo = {bar: "baz", qux: "quux"};
var arr = [1,2];
var arr = [1,
2];
var arr = [
1,
2,
];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
only-multiline
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "only-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "only-multiline"]*/
var foo = { bar: "baz", qux: "quux", };
var arr = [1,2,];
var arr = [1,
2,];
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "only-multiline"
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", "only-multiline"]*/
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
};
var foo = {
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
};
var foo = {bar: "baz", qux: "quux"};
var arr = [1,2];
var arr = [1,
2];
var arr = [
1,
2,
];
var arr = [
1,
2
];
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux",
});
foo({
bar: "baz",
qux: "quux"
});
functions
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the {"functions": "never"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "never"}]*/
function foo(a, b,) {
}
foo(a, b,);
new foo(a, b,);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the {"functions": "never"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "never"}]*/
function foo(a, b) {
}
foo(a, b);
new foo(a, b);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the {"functions": "always"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "always"}]*/
function foo(a, b) {
}
foo(a, b);
new foo(a, b);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the {"functions": "always"}
option:
/*eslint comma-dangle: ["error", {"functions": "always"}]*/
function foo(a, b,) {
}
foo(a, b,);
new foo(a, b,);
When Not To Use It
You can turn this rule off if you are not concerned with dangling commas. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/