Sign upLogin

vorteil/vorteil

View on GitHub
Star
pkg/provisioners/google/google.go

Summary

Maintainability
A
2 hrs
Test Coverage

Method Provisioner.init has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
Open

func (p *Provisioner) init() error {

    var (
        err        error
        oauthToken *jwt.Config
Severity: Major
Found in pkg/provisioners/google/google.go - About 40 mins to fix

    Method Provisioner.Provision has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
    Open

    func (p *Provisioner) Provision(args *provisioners.ProvisionArgs) error {
    projectID := p.keyMap["project_id"].(string)

    img, err := p.computeClient.Images.Get(projectID, args.Name).Do()
    if err == nil && !args.Force {
    Severity: Major
    Found in pkg/provisioners/google/google.go - About 35 mins to fix

      TODO found
      Open

      // ProvisionArgs TODO:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in pkg/provisioners/google/google.go by fixme

      Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func NewProvisioner(log elog.View, cfg *Config) (*Provisioner, error) {
    p := new(Provisioner)
    p.cfg = cfg
    p.log = log
      Severity: Major
      Found in pkg/provisioners/google/google.go and 4 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
      pkg/provisioners/amazon/amazon.go on lines 71..82
      pkg/provisioners/azure/azure.go on lines 62..72
      pkg/provisioners/nutanix/nutanix.go on lines 37..47
      pkg/provisioners/vcenter/vcenter.go on lines 58..68

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 114.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status