lib/watir/wait.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
6 hrs
Test Coverage

Method match_attributes has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def match_attributes(opt)
      proc do
        opt.keys.all? do |key|
          expected = opt[key]
          actual = if is_a?(Element) && !respond_to?(key)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/watir/wait.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_proc has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def create_proc(opt)
      proc do
        reset! if opt.delete(:element_reset) && is_a?(Element)
        (opt.empty? || match_attributes(opt).call) && (!block_given? || yield(self))
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/watir/wait.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method while has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def while(depr_timeout = nil, depr_message = nil, timeout: nil, message: nil, interval: nil, object: nil)
        if depr_message || depr_timeout
          Watir.logger.deprecate 'Using arguments for Wait#while', 'keywords', ids: %i[while timeout_arguments]
          timeout = depr_timeout
          message = depr_message
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/watir/wait.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def wait_while(depr_timeout = nil, depr_message = nil, timeout: nil, message: nil, interval: nil, **opt, &blk)
      if depr_message || depr_timeout
        Watir.logger.deprecate 'Using arguments for #wait_while', 'keywords', ids: [:timeout_arguments]
        timeout = depr_timeout
        message = depr_message
Severity: Major
Found in lib/watir/wait.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/watir/wait.rb on lines 114..127

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 59.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def wait_until(depr_timeout = nil, depr_message = nil, timeout: nil, message: nil, interval: nil, **opt, &blk)
      if depr_message || depr_timeout
        Watir.logger.deprecate 'Using arguments for #wait_until', 'keywords', ids: [:timeout_arguments]
        timeout = depr_timeout
        message = depr_message
Severity: Major
Found in lib/watir/wait.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/watir/wait.rb on lines 145..158

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 59.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def wait_while_present(depr_timeout = nil, timeout: nil, interval: nil, message: nil)
      timeout = depr_timeout if depr_timeout
      Watir.logger.deprecate "#{self.class}#wait_while_present",
                             "#{self.class}#wait_while(&:present?)",
                             ids: [:wait_while_present]
Severity: Major
Found in lib/watir/wait.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/watir/wait.rb on lines 176..183

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def wait_until_present(depr_timeout = nil, timeout: nil, interval: nil, message: nil)
      timeout = depr_timeout if depr_timeout
      Watir.logger.deprecate "#{self.class}#wait_until_present",
                             "#{self.class}#wait_until(&:present?)",
                             ids: [:wait_until_present]
Severity: Major
Found in lib/watir/wait.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/watir/wait.rb on lines 201..208

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status