Method LazyInit
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def LazyInit
# already initialized
return if @initialized
Builtins.y2milestone("Initializing...")
Method UnLoadExtension
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def UnLoadExtension(package, message)
Builtins.y2error("This module should be used in Stage::initial only!") if !Stage.initial
if package.nil? || package == ""
Builtins.y2error("Such package name can't work: %1", package)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method LoadExtension
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def LoadExtension(package, message)
Builtins.y2error("This module should be used in Stage::initial only!") if !Stage.initial
if package.nil? || package == ""
Builtins.y2error("Such package name can't work: %1", package)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method MergeURLsParams
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def MergeURLsParams(base_url, url_with_modifs)
if base_url.nil? || url_with_modifs.nil?
Builtins.y2error("Wrong params: %1 or %2", base_url, url_with_modifs)
return nil
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method MergeURLs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def MergeURLs(url_base, url_with_modifs)
if url_base.nil? || url_with_modifs.nil?
Builtins.y2error("Wrong URLs: %1 or %2", url_base, url_with_modifs)
return nil
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"