Showing 2,501 of 2,501 total issues
File attribute.rb
has 832 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ObjectManager::Attribute < ApplicationModel
include HasDefaultModelUserRelations
include ChecksClientNotification
include CanSeed
Method csv_import
has a Cognitive Complexity of 96 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def csv_import(data)
try = data[:try].to_s == 'true'
delete = data[:delete].to_s == 'true'
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export type CurrentUserAttributesFragment = { __typename?: 'User', email?: string | null, id: string, internalId: number, firstname?: string | null, lastname?: string | null, fullname?: string | null, image?: string | null, preferences?: any | null, hasSecondaryOrganizations?: boolean | null, permissions?: { __typename?: 'UserPermission', names: Array<string> } | null, objectAttributeValues?: Array<{ __typename?: 'ObjectAttributeValue', value?: any | null, renderedLink?: string | null, attribute: { __typename?: 'ObjectManagerFrontendAttribute', name: string, display: string } }> | null, organization?: { __typename?: 'Organization', id: string, internalId: number, name?: string | null, active?: boolean | null, objectAttributeValues?: Array<{ __typename?: 'ObjectAttributeValue', value?: any | null, renderedLink?: string | null, attribute: { __typename?: 'ObjectManagerFrontendAttribute', name: string, display: string } }> | null } | null };
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 337.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export type CurrentUserQuery = { __typename?: 'Queries', currentUser: { __typename?: 'User', email?: string | null, id: string, internalId: number, firstname?: string | null, lastname?: string | null, fullname?: string | null, image?: string | null, preferences?: any | null, hasSecondaryOrganizations?: boolean | null, permissions?: { __typename?: 'UserPermission', names: Array<string> } | null, objectAttributeValues?: Array<{ __typename?: 'ObjectAttributeValue', value?: any | null, renderedLink?: string | null, attribute: { __typename?: 'ObjectManagerFrontendAttribute', name: string, display: string } }> | null, organization?: { __typename?: 'Organization', id: string, internalId: number, name?: string | null, active?: boolean | null, objectAttributeValues?: Array<{ __typename?: 'ObjectAttributeValue', value?: any | null, renderedLink?: string | null, attribute: { __typename?: 'ObjectManagerFrontendAttribute', name: string, display: string } }> | null } | null } };
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 337.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method association_name_to_id_convert
has a Cognitive Complexity of 92 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def association_name_to_id_convert(params)
if params.respond_to?(:permit!)
params = params.permit!.to_h
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File email_parser.rb
has 762 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Channel::EmailParser
include Channel::EmailHelper
PROCESS_TIME_MAX = 180
EMAIL_REGEX = %r{.+@.+}
File twitter_sync.rb
has 762 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'http/uri'
class TwitterSync
STATUS_URL_TEMPLATE = 'https://twitter.com/_/status/%s'.freeze
File search_index_backend.rb
has 758 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class SearchIndexBackend
SUPPORTED_ES_VERSION_MINIMUM = '7.8'.freeze
SUPPORTED_ES_VERSION_LESS_THAN = '9'.freeze
File guided-setup-manual-channel-email.spec.ts
has 727 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Copyright (C) 2012-2024 Zammad Foundation, https://zammad-foundation.org/
import { getNode } from '@formkit/core'
import {
getByLabelText,
Method condition_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 82 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def condition_query(block_condition)
query_must = []
query_must_not = []
current_user = options[:current_user]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
it('can show inbound configuration form when roundtrip is unsuccessful', async () => {
const view = await visitView('/guided-setup/manual/channels/email')
const accountForm = view.getByTestId('channel-email-account')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 296.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
it('can show outbound configuration form when roundtrip is unsuccessful', async () => {
const view = await visitView('/guided-setup/manual/channels/email')
const accountForm = view.getByTestId('channel-email-account')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 296.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File users_controller.rb
has 698 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class UsersController < ApplicationController
include ChecksUserAttributesByCurrentUserPermission
include CanPaginate
prepend_before_action -> { authorize! }, only: %i[import_example import_start search history unlock]
Method config
has 303 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.config
config = {}
config[:metric] = {}
config[:metric][:count] = {
Method perform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 76 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
# return if we run import mode
return if Setting.get('import_mode')
return if @item[:object] != 'Ticket'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File fill_db.rb
has 666 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module FillDb
=begin
fill your database with demo records
Function useTicketEditForm
has 288 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const useTicketEditForm = (
ticket: Ref<TicketById | undefined>,
form: Ref<FormRef | undefined>,
) => {
const ticketArticleTypes = computed(() => {
File telegram_helper.rb
has 645 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'telegram/bot'
class TelegramHelper
attr_accessor :client
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
it('supports clearing of the existing value when option goes away', async () => {
const optionsProp = cloneDeep(testOptions)
optionsProp.push({
value: 10,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 264.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
it('supports clearing of the existing value when option goes away', async () => {
const optionsProp = cloneDeep(testOptions)
optionsProp.push({
value: 3,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 264.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76