zold-io/zold

View on GitHub
lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method pay has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def pay(wallet, opts)
      raise 'The wallet is absent' unless wallet.exists?
      tax = Tax.new(wallet)
      debt = total = tax.debt
      @log.info("The current debt of #{wallet.mnemo} is #{debt} (#{debt.to_i} zents), \
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method run has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def run(args = [])
      opts = Slop.parse(args, help: true, suppress_errors: true) do |o|
        o.banner = "Usage: zold taxes command [options]
Available commands:
    #{Rainbow('taxes pay').green} wallet
Severity: Major
Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method pay has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def pay(wallet, opts)
          raise 'The wallet is absent' unless wallet.exists?
          tax = Tax.new(wallet)
          debt = total = tax.debt
          @log.info("The current debt of #{wallet.mnemo} is #{debt} (#{debt.to_i} zents), \
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def run(args = [])
            opts = Slop.parse(args, help: true, suppress_errors: true) do |o|
              o.banner = "Usage: zold taxes command [options]
      Available commands:
          #{Rainbow('taxes pay').green} wallet
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method top_scores has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def top_scores(opts)
            best = []
            @remotes.iterate(@log) do |r|
              @log.debug("Testing #{r}...")
              uri = '/'
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              pem = File.read(opts['private-key'])
              unless opts['keygap'].empty?
                pem = pem.sub('*' * opts['keygap'].length, opts['keygap'])
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
      lib/zold/commands/pay.rb on lines 166..168

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 29.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

            when 'show'
              raise 'At least one wallet ID is required' unless mine[1]
              mine[1..-1].each do |id|
                @wallets.acq(Id.new(id)) do |w|
                  show(w, opts)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
      lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb on lines 105..109

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 25.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

            when 'debt'
              raise 'At least one wallet ID is required' unless mine[1]
              mine[1..-1].each do |id|
                @wallets.acq(Id.new(id)) do |w|
                  debt(w, opts)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
      lib/zold/commands/taxes.rb on lines 98..102

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 25.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status