Showing 15 of 21 total issues
Method class_attribute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def class_attribute(*attrs)
options = attrs.last.is_a?(Hash) ? attrs.pop : {}
instance_reader = options.fetch(:instance_accessor, true) && options.fetch(:instance_reader, true)
instance_writer = options.fetch(:instance_accessor, true) && options.fetch(:instance_writer, true)
instance_predicate = options.fetch(:instance_predicate, true)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method skip_validation?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def skip_validation?(options)
if options[:if]
if options[:if].is_a?(Symbol)
true unless self.send(options[:if])
elsif options[:if].is_a?(Proc)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(number, options)
return [] if number.nil?
errors = []
if options[:greater_than]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(entity)
errors = AttrValidator::ValidationErrors.new
self.validations ||= {}
self.custom_validations ||= []
self.associated_validations ||= {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class ValidationErrors
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AttrValidator::ValidationErrors
attr_reader :messages
def initialize
@messages = {}
Method class_attribute
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def class_attribute(*attrs)
options = attrs.last.is_a?(Hash) ? attrs.pop : {}
instance_reader = options.fetch(:instance_accessor, true) && options.fetch(:instance_reader, true)
instance_writer = options.fetch(:instance_accessor, true) && options.fetch(:instance_writer, true)
instance_predicate = options.fetch(:instance_predicate, true)
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(object, options)
return [] if object.nil?
errors = []
if options[:min]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(entity)
errors = AttrValidator::ValidationErrors.new
self.validations ||= {}
self.custom_validations ||= []
self.associated_validations ||= {}
Method append_features
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def append_features(base)
if base.instance_variable_defined?(:@_dependencies)
base.instance_variable_get(:@_dependencies) << self
return false
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
true if self.instance_exec(&options[:unless])
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(value, email_flag)
return [] if value.nil?
errors = []
if email_flag
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(value, presence)
errors = []
if presence
if value.nil? || (value.is_a?(String) && value.strip.length == 0)
errors << AttrValidator::I18n.t('errors.can_not_be_blank')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(value, url_flag)
return [] if value.nil?
errors = []
if url_flag
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_children
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_children(association_name, validator, children, errors)
if validator.respond_to?(:validate_all)
children_errors = validator.validate_all(children)
elsif validator.respond_to?(:validate)
children_errors = children.inject([]) do |errors, child|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(value, options)
return [] if value.nil?
errors = []
if options[:in]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"