Function exports
has 158 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(sequelize, DataTypes) {
var User = sequelize.define('User', {
id: { type: DataTypes.BIGINT, autoIncrement: true, primaryKey: true },
email: { type: DataTypes.STRING, unique: true, allowNull: false },
login: { type: DataTypes.STRING, allowNull: false },
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(sequelize, DataTypes) {
var User = sequelize.define('User', {
id: { type: DataTypes.BIGINT, autoIncrement: true, primaryKey: true },
email: { type: DataTypes.STRING, unique: true, allowNull: false },
login: { type: DataTypes.STRING, allowNull: false },
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getAnsweredSurveysWithAllDates
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
User.prototype.getAnsweredSurveysWithAllDates = function() {
var userId = this.id;
return Promise.reduce(this.getVotes({
include: [
{
Function getAnsweredSurveys
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
User.prototype.getAnsweredSurveys = function(query, order, pageSize, pageNr) {
var userId = this.id,
orders;
if (order === 'answer') {
orders = [[sequelize.fn('max', sequelize.col('vote_date')), 'DESC'], [models.Survey, 'id', 'DESC']];
'pageSize' is already defined. Open
pageSize = (pageSize === null || isNaN(pageSize)) ? defaultPageSize : pageSize;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
disallow variable redeclaration (no-redeclare)
In JavaScript, it's possible to redeclare the same variable name using var
. This can lead to confusion as to where the variable is actually declared and initialized.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating variables that have multiple declarations in the same scope.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-redeclare: "error"*/
var a = 3;
var a = 10;
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-redeclare: "error"*/
var a = 3;
// ...
a = 10;
Options
This rule takes one optional argument, an object with a boolean property "builtinGlobals"
. It defaults to false
.
If set to true
, this rule also checks redeclaration of built-in globals, such as Object
, Array
, Number
...
builtinGlobals
Examples of incorrect code for the { "builtinGlobals": true }
option:
/*eslint no-redeclare: ["error", { "builtinGlobals": true }]*/
var Object = 0;
Examples of incorrect code for the { "builtinGlobals": true }
option and the browser
environment:
/*eslint no-redeclare: ["error", { "builtinGlobals": true }]*/
/*eslint-env browser*/
var top = 0;
The browser
environment has many built-in global variables (for example, top
). Some of built-in global variables cannot be redeclared.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Missing radix parameter. Open
if (isNaN(parseInt(results.count))) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require Radix Parameter (radix)
When using the parseInt()
function it is common to omit the second argument, the radix, and let the function try to determine from the first argument what type of number it is. By default, parseInt()
will autodetect decimal and hexadecimal (via 0x
prefix). Prior to ECMAScript 5, parseInt()
also autodetected octal literals, which caused problems because many developers assumed a leading 0
would be ignored.
This confusion led to the suggestion that you always use the radix parameter to parseInt()
to eliminate unintended consequences. So instead of doing this:
var num = parseInt("071"); // 57
Do this:
var num = parseInt("071", 10); // 71
ECMAScript 5 changed the behavior of parseInt()
so that it no longer autodetects octal literals and instead treats them as decimal literals. However, the differences between hexadecimal and decimal interpretation of the first parameter causes many developers to continue using the radix parameter to ensure the string is interpreted in the intended way.
On the other hand, if the code is targeting only ES5-compliant environments passing the radix 10
may be redundant. In such a case you might want to disallow using such a radix.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at preventing the unintended conversion of a string to a number of a different base than intended or at preventing the redundant 10
radix if targeting modern environments only.
Options
There are two options for this rule:
-
"always"
enforces providing a radix (default) -
"as-needed"
disallows providing the10
radix
always
Examples of incorrect code for the default "always"
option:
/*eslint radix: "error"*/
var num = parseInt("071");
var num = parseInt(someValue);
var num = parseInt("071", "abc");
var num = parseInt();
Examples of correct code for the default "always"
option:
/*eslint radix: "error"*/
var num = parseInt("071", 10);
var num = parseInt("071", 8);
var num = parseFloat(someValue);
as-needed
Examples of incorrect code for the "as-needed"
option:
/*eslint radix: ["error", "as-needed"]*/
var num = parseInt("071", 10);
var num = parseInt("071", "abc");
var num = parseInt();
Examples of correct code for the "as-needed"
option:
/*eslint radix: ["error", "as-needed"]*/
var num = parseInt("071");
var num = parseInt("071", 8);
var num = parseFloat(someValue);
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce either presence or omission of the 10
radix value you can turn this rule off.
Further Reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (pageSize !== null) {
params.limit = pageSize;
if (pageNr !== null && !isNaN(pageNr)) {
params.offset = (pageNr - 1) * pageSize;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0, iLen = orders.length; i<iLen; i++) {
orders[i].unshift(models.Survey);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76