Showing 10 of 10 total issues
Method default!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def default!
cells.each do |cell|
cell.rules.fetch(:position)
default_position cell
default_message cell
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_or_remove_dynamic_fields_on_mapping!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_or_remove_dynamic_fields_on_mapping!
cells = definition.cells.dup
# cells without optional and not found dynamic field
definition.cells = [].tap do |_cells|
while(!cells.empty?) do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_or_remove_dynamic_fields_on_collection!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_or_remove_dynamic_fields_on_collection! y
cells = definition.cells.dup
# cells without optional and not found dynamic field
definition.cells = [].tap do |_cells|
while(!cells.empty?) do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_rules
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_rules y=nil
definition.type == Definition::MAPPING ? find_or_remove_dynamic_fields_on_mapping! : find_or_remove_dynamic_fields_on_collection!(y)
definition.cells.each do |cell|
_y, x = position cell.rules.fetch(:position)
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method verify_valid_values!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def verify_valid_values! cell, value
values = cell.rules.fetch(:values)
if values.class == Range
raise unless values.include?(value.to_f)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fill_it
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fill_it parsed_data, source_data
definition.cells.each do |cell|
if cell.rules.fetch :mappable
x = cell.rules.fetch :position
if (nested = cell.rules.fetch :nested)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method default_position
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def default_position cell
case type
when MAPPING
y, x = cell.rules.fetch(:position, ['undefined', 'undefined'])
cell.rules.merge! key: "key_#{y}_#{x}" unless cell.rules.has_key? :key
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fill_it
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fill_it parsed_data, source_data
definition.cells.each do |cell|
if cell.rules.fetch :mappable
y, x = cell.rules.fetch :position
if (nested = cell.rules.fetch :nested)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse
load_data_source
definition.validate!
definition.default!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate!
unless TYPES.include?(@type)
raise "not suitable type, please use '#{MAPPING}' or '#{COLLECTION}'"
end
raise 'cells must be an Array of cell' unless self.cells.class == Array
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"