Showing 15 of 15 total issues
Method ingest_core
has a Cognitive Complexity of 56 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ingest_core
@normalized_data = {}
has_name_and_id = @core_fields[:id] && @core_fields[:scientificname]
unless has_name_and_id
raise(DarwinCore::CoreFileError,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_classification_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_classification_path(taxon)
return unless taxon.classification_path_id.empty?
@paths_num += 1
if @paths_num % 10_000 == 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File classification_normalizer.rb
has 339 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class DarwinCore
# Returns tree representation of Darwin Core file with vernacular and
# and synonyms attached to the taxon nodes
class ClassificationNormalizer
attr_reader :error_names, :tree, :normalized_data, :dwc
Class ClassificationNormalizer
has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ClassificationNormalizer
attr_reader :error_names, :tree, :normalized_data, :dwc
alias darwin_core dwc
def initialize(dwc_instance)
Method get_classification_path
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_classification_path(taxon)
return unless taxon.classification_path_id.empty?
@paths_num += 1
if @paths_num % 10_000 == 0
Method read
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read(batch_size = 10_000)
DarwinCore.logger_write(@dwc.object_id, "Reading #{name} data")
res = []
errors = []
args = define_csv_args
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ingest_core
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ingest_core
@normalized_data = {}
has_name_and_id = @core_fields[:id] && @core_fields[:scientificname]
unless has_name_and_id
raise(DarwinCore::CoreFileError,
Method add_synonym_from_core
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_synonym_from_core(taxon_id, row)
cf = @core_fields
@synonyms[row[cf[:id]]] = taxon_id
@normalized_data[row[taxon_id]] = DarwinCore::TaxonNormalized.new unless @normalized_data[row[taxon_id]]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_synonym
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_synonym(record, fields)
set_scientific_name(record, fields)
SynonymNormalized.new(
nil,
record[fields[:scientificname]],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method calculate_classification_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calculate_classification_path
@paths_num = 0
@normalized_data.each do |_taxon_id, taxon|
next unless taxon.classification_path_id.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_csv_row
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_csv_row(result, errors, row)
str = row.join("")
str = str.force_encoding("utf-8")
if str.encoding.name == "UTF-8" && str.valid_encoding?
result << row.map { |f| f.nil? ? nil : f.force_encoding("utf-8") }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_scientific_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_scientific_name(row, fields)
row[fields[:scientificname]] = "N/A" unless row[fields[:scientificname]]
canonical_name = nil
scientific_name = row[fields[:scientificname]].strip
if separate_canonical_and_authorship?(row, fields)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method search_for_file_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_for_file_path(entries)
res = nil
entries.each do |e|
check_path = File.join(@dir_path, e)
next unless FileTest.directory?(check_path) &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method unpack
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unpack
clean
raise DarwinCore::FileNotFoundError unless File.exist?(@archive_path)
success = @unpacker.call(@dir_path, @archive_path) if @unpacker
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_vernaculars_from_row
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_vernaculars_from_row(row, fields)
language = find_vernacular_language(row, fields)
locality = fields[:locality] ? row[fields[:locality]] : nil
country_code = fields[:countrycode] ? row[fields[:countrycode]] : nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"